I'm flipped

On2 can be danced in any style. Linear, Cuban or Cali. It is rare to see people dancing casino or Cali style on2. That could be the reason why some people believe on2 is almost always danced linear.

Re. casino being rare on 2: I assume it's because many Cuban salsa schools worldwide are not interested in teaching contratiempo, and/or they don't play salsa or son music so their dancers don't have opportunity to use it. Or maybe the dancers are just not interested.

As for Cali style on 2? I've never done it, I've never seen it done and I've never heard of anyone doing it. Ever. The basic rhythm of Cali salsa comes direct from cumbia so, much as I love on 2 for salsa, doing that cumbia rhythm on 2 would be wrong.
 
References please. First time ever I have heard cumbia and cali salsa in the same sentence.

Seriously? I'm talking about the rhythm of the basic way most Colombians dance. Not the academy stuff. I recall when I did my online presentation about Cali for Latinjazz I asked Terence what influences he could see in Cali salsa. His first words were, 'I see a lot of cumbia in there'.

Actually that basic cumbia step also exists in son. On 2. Except the syncopation is different in cumbia than it is in son, and with the cumbia syncopation I just don't think it would work on 2.

When son first came to Cali and S America, I'm sure there wasn't a large number of Cuban immigrants around to influence the dance (like there was in NY). People just took what they already had i.e. the popular indigenous dances and modified it (probably gradually) to suit the music. Later on for some reason people got into suoer fast music so looked to the US for steps to facilitate dancing fast. Jive worked better for that than old school mambo.
 
So the stepping style comes from swing/jive (remember a thread on it) and the rhythm from cumbia? :)

That's pretty much it. But it's the rhythm of the basic step that comes from cumbia, not the rhythm of the fast stepping. In fact in some of the fast steps they use a speeded up on 1 cha cha cha I believe. I wouldn't even do that in a cold environment, let alone in the tropics.
 
Seriously? I'm talking about the rhythm of the basic way most Colombians dance. Not the academy stuff. I recall when I did my online presentation about Cali for Latinjazz I asked Terence what influences he could see in Cali salsa. His first words were, 'I see a lot of cumbia in there'.

Actually that basic cumbia step also exists in son. On 2. Except the syncopation is different in cumbia than it is in son, and with the cumbia syncopation I just don't think it would work on 2.

When son first came to Cali and S America, I'm sure there wasn't a large number of Cuban immigrants around to influence the dance (like there was in NY). People just took what they already had i.e. the popular indigenous dances and modified it (probably gradually) to suit the music. Later on for some reason people got into suoer fast music so looked to the US for steps to facilitate dancing fast. Jive worked better for that than old school mambo.
So your reference is what some guy looking at a video saw?
Did that guy provide any reference as to where cumbia came from and how it was danced traditionally?
Have you ever been to Barranquilla?
Have you heard of the Museo del Caribe?

Separate question:
Why do you pontificate on dances you do not dance nor have taken lessons in and that are danced to music you do not like?
Makes no sense to me.
 
So your reference is what some guy looking at a video saw?
Did that guy provide any reference as to where cumbia came from and how it was danced traditionally?

My reference is my own eyes i.e. how salsa is danced in Cali and the rest of Colombia by the majority of people i.e. those who have never been to classes. (N.B. those who do go to classes are a big minority i.e. not at all unusual.)

Since when has Terence been 'some guy looking at a video'?

When I refer to the basic cumbia step I'm aware that I'm referring to cumbia as a partner dance dancing to the contemporary form of the music. Traditionally it's danced to folkloric music. and whether the traditional dance has the same basic step I don't know.

Have you ever been to Barranquilla?
Have you heard of the Museo del Caribe?

No and no. Why?

Separate question:
Why do you pontificate on dances you do not dance nor have taken lessons in and that are danced to music you do not like?
Makes no sense to me.

It's not pontification it's sharing information. Which is the purpose of the forum I believe.

And anyway I do, out of necessity, dance Colombian style, albeit in a very basic form. In fact more often than not I dance like that all night. Out of necessity not choice. I've never taken lessons though, for the same reason most Colombians and most people in Cali don't take lessons: lack of interest/time/money.

I once saw a local dancer in Cali who had started to take classes and started to do all the complicated moves, and a caleña I know specifically told me after dancing with him that she much preferred dancing with him before he learnt all those moves. Maybe with time he got better at leading the theatrical stuff but I think for her she'd rather just do the basics. I doubt she's alone. Not to say that there's anything wrong in taking lessons in Cali style, but it's definitely not an essential if you want to integrate.

As for danced to music I do not like - there are Cali tunes I don't particularly like (Margie or the Wham track spring to mind) but the vast majority of music I hear here I like, a bit or a lot. In fact a lot of the big Cali tunes I have copies of on CD or vinyl. Which has often taken a lot of searching and financial investment.

My complaint is that tunes get speeded up here sometimes, and that often venues play the fast stuff only after a certain time. Whereas on the radio, in la Calle de la Salsa, at houseparties etc, the music is far more varied and better.

You seem to think that if I don't portray or collaborate with an idealised version of Cali salsa it means I dislike it and am being unfaithful or unpatriotic or even treasonous. I believe:

truth is more interesting than fiction
if the scene is constructively criticised (from an international salsa perspective) then it has better opportunity to improve, which will benefit the city
there is no point in lying or keeping quiet on any topic.

Do you think no one else sees what I see? I can assure you that a number of visitors to the city who are good dancers have told me the same things I have noticed and other constructive criticisms. Some love Cali regardless and others see little appeal in the salsa scene here. In fact the only 2 women I know who are accomplished dancers and have visited have both been disappointed and have no intention of returning. @Sabrosura (pre kizomba conversion) was one of them.

And as re. the academy version of Cali salsa dance: Terence said over and over on this forum that the moves were from jive and swing.

Again, it's not a blanket criticism. I love Cali and love living en la capital mundial de la salsa. But I'm not wearing rose-tinted spectacles. Nor are you - but your tastes, knowledge and experiences are different to mine. I suspect most salseros would see things from my perspective more than yours.

A few years ago I gave an hour long online presentation, purely about the Cali salsa scene, for an academic series @Latinjazz was doing. Do you think I did a hatchet job? I portrayed it from an objective viewpoint. There was at least one caleño watching and I didn't get any complaints. In fact he contacted me afterwards to say that I was obviously a real salsa lover.
 
Last edited:
Actually that basic cumbia step also exists in son. On 2. Except the syncopation is different in cumbia than it is in son, and with the cumbia syncopation I just don't think it would work on 2.

What do you mean by "syncopation" in this context?

Can you show us any vids of son where you can point out this cumbia step?
 
What do you mean by "syncopation" in this context?

Cumbia is 1 and 2 3 and 4


Can you show us any vids of son where you can point out this cumbia step?

It's the back step they use extensively in son. But as I say the syncopation is different, also I have no idea if it appeared in cumbia before son.

Both Son and Cumbia are the same identical basic, difference being one is syncopated the other is not, both in a modified 5th position break .


…. Yep, the Cumbia basic is identical ( but syncopated ) .IF breaking behind . a side step is just a side step common to many dances .

 
Last edited:
I've never taken lessons though, for the same reason most Colombians and most people in Cali don't take lessons: lack of interest/time/money.
So you don't feel like you are missing out on anything? But you state that you have to dance in a certain way out of necessity? How do you reconcile that?
 
Yes all of those and probably more. But you may be overthinking this.
Not overthinking. Your posts are about 99+% providing and teaching and to date I have not seen a post where you backtracked on anything you stated. The result is that in your mind you are always right and others are always wrong. Thus it is not a discussion with an open mind. It is pontification.
 
So you don't feel like you are missing out on anything? But you state that you have to dance in a certain way out of necessity? How do you reconcile that?

I have to dance Colombian style because virtually all the basic moves in old school NY mambo and salsa (my preference) do not exist in Colombian salsa. Nor does old school on 2 timing. Even the best dancer in the world can't pick up a dance without having a little bit of instruction first, and anyway, 99% of women here want to dance the local style so best to give them what they want.

If I wanted to dance on stage then I would be a fool not to take classes here. I'm sure all the dancers who compete have learnt and practiced in academies. Whereas most who just dance socially keep it simple and have not been to classes.

Am I missing out on something by not taking classes? Yes I've never learnt all the fancy, theatrical moves. I can live with that.
 
Not overthinking. Your posts are about 99+% providing and teaching and to date I have not seen a post where you backtracked on anything you stated. The result is that in your mind you are always right and others are always wrong. Thus it is not a discussion with an open mind. It is pontification.
Let me give you an example: If you were to take classes in Cali style you would experience the difficulty of NOT doing a weight shift when in Cuban or linear you would do a weight shift. It is a real challenge. The basic steps in Cali do not require that. One can dance Cuban casino salsa, tap on the 4 and the 8, hold the core w/o moving forward/back as in linear or open/close as in Cuban. But then come the advanced steps and its a whole other world. There is no other dance like it and no other dance that is as challenging. As I said, you are missing out.
 
Your posts are about 99+% providing and teaching

As opposed to what? Asking questions?

to date I have not seen a post where you backtracked on anything you stated.

Have you seen a post where someone has shown something I have stated to be erroneous? If so then of course I need to backtrack. If not then what's the point in backtracking?

I'm sure I've made plenty of mistakes in all my years on here however I'm not going to apologise for having made a lot of effort to know about what interests me i.e. the history of mambo and salsa music and dance.
 
Let me give you an example: If you were to take classes in Cali style you would experience the difficulty of NOT doing a weight shift when in Cuban or linear you would do a weight shift. It is a real challenge. The basic steps in Cali do not require that. One can dance Cuban casino salsa, tap on the 4 and the 8, hold the core w/o moving forward/back as in linear or open/close as in Cuban. But then come the advanced steps and its a whole other world. There is no other dance like it and no other dance that is as challenging. As I said, you are missing out.

To be fair there's lots of things in this world we can study and many are very interesting. But to learn any discipline requires serious financial and, more than anything, mental investment. Why would I choose to learn something that I don't particularly like? Not to say I dislike it, but ultimately dance is an expression of one's personality. I can tell from looking at you dance that you like and relate to Cali style salsa.

When I first met you in the real world I knew how to play maracas and cowbell quite well. On bongos and congas I was garbage and faking it. On güiro I knew nothing. Since then I've spent countless hours learning, studying and practicing on all of those instruments (except maracas). I've received classes. The cost in money and more than anything time has been high and really I'm only just starting to get anywhere. For me it's been worth it but I'm sure most other people wouldn't see the point. Would I recommend studying those instruments? Definitely, but only if the person has the desire.
 
When I first met you in the real world I knew how to play maracas and cowbell quite well. On bongos and congas I was garbage and faking it. On güiro I knew nothing. Since then I've spent countless hours learning, studying and practicing on all of those instruments (except maracas). I've received classes. The cost in money and more than anything time has been high and really I'm only just starting to get anywhere. For me it's been worth it but I'm sure most other people wouldn't see the point. Would I recommend studying those instruments? Definitely, but only if the person has the desire.
Ok. Got it. In summary: you are really into the music and understanding it fully. Dance: not so much. Thats fair.

But why make all those comments on the dance and yet without ever having attempted to practice what you are writing about? The OP of this thread @songname was commenting about exactly that. The practice of dance is not at all what it looks like. The feel one gets when dancing to the music is very different than what others can see. So I rest my case, you are not so much into dancing - you are rather more into just talking about it and conveying "expertise" solely from visual input.
 
Back
Top