We're Doomed!! (Question for Pro's)

luisco

Changui
Found this on Youtube^^:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM_hrjzogg0

Question is: Do you care if someone is videotaping you? I remember a couple of years ago i got threaten by the members of a dance group cause i was filming one of his friend (socialdancing) with the same words as the guy in the video only that they were serious...things have changed since then but there are still places and persons i wouldn't videotape, what do u think?
 
Found this on Youtube^^:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM_hrjzogg0

Question is: Do you care if someone is videotaping you? I remember a couple of years ago i got threaten by the members of a dance group cause i was filming one of his friend (socialdancing) with the same words as the guy in the video only that they were serious...things have changed since then but there are still places and persons i wouldn't videotape, what do u think?


Its not what I " think " its what I know.. I do not mind people vid me, IF they ask permission ... however.. there are many Pros ( mainly those that do shows ) that do NOT give permission... ALWAYS ask first..
 
Especially at the end of a festival workshop I think it's normal to make a vid of what was taught. However, there is a difference between taping what you learned for your own use and putting it on youtube.

The first is helping you remember what you paid for, the second is possibly taking away somebody's income.

As for social dancing, I think it's only normal to get permission from the people you tape as we're still talking about their privacy, whether they are pros or not.
 
First, please note that this video clip was taken right at the end of a workshop at a congress and that it's not about social dancing here. I'm pretty sure we talked about the issue of videotaping in social dancing before, but can't find the thread currently. Social dancing is a completely different issue then workshop videos, which is the case here.

As to the clip itself, I can understand Tamambo and other instructor who ask us not to put the videos of the workshops on YouTube, Facebook or any site that you can think of. Whenever we take part in a congress workshop, we've payed quite some money for this chance and supported the congress as well as the artist. So at the end most instructors still like to give us the chance to videotape the combination to help us remember it and later use parts (if we like) in our dancing. But with videoclips of workshop combinations showing up on YouTube (especially those with counts), other people get new combinations/moves for free. As I personally dislike this practice (Why should others get all their moves for free from YouTube, Facebook, etc., when I and others had to pay for it?), I can understand the frustration of the instructors. And seeing how the request of at least some instructors to not put workshop clips on YouTube are ignored, I can understand Tamambo sarcastic advice to follow his request. :) Also I know and have experienced one instructor, who isn't going to offer the possibility of videotaping at the end of the workshops anymore, because of people ignoring requests. And I seriously hope that we don't end up with nearly all instructors denying us the chance to videotape workshops, just because some people out there have not respect for the requests of instructors.
 
New lesser known instructor performers can only gain from the publicity of getting their clips circulating to a wide audience. The events can gain if they are mentioned in the clip. The better known instructors who already have substantial dvd sales can only lose.
Its similar to the music situation. New artists upload their music for free to get attention, established artists have their lawyers track down and prosecute copyright infringement.

In the end the newer artists can become established and face the same problem and try to stop freebies from circulating while another cadre of newer artists emerges to take their place.

Btw, youtube and facebook allow users to flag content for any reason including privacy or copyright violation.
 
As to the clip itself, I can understand Tamambo and other instructor who ask us not to put the videos of the workshops on YouTube, Facebook or any site that you can think of. Whenever we take part in a congress workshop, we've payed quite some money for this chance and supported the congress as well as the artist. So at the end most instructors still like to give us the chance to videotape the combination to help us remember it and later use parts (if we like) in our dancing. But with videoclips of workshop combinations showing up on YouTube (especially those with counts), other people get new combinations/moves for free. As I personally dislike this practice (Why should others get all their moves for free from YouTube, Facebook, etc., when I and others had to pay for it?), I can understand the frustration of the instructors. And seeing how the request of at least some instructors to not put workshop clips on YouTube are ignored, I can understand Tamambo sarcastic advice to follow his request. :) Also I know and have experienced one instructor, who isn't going to offer the possibility of videotaping at the end of the workshops anymore, because of people ignoring requests. And I seriously hope that we don't end up with nearly all instructors denying us the chance to videotape workshops, just because some people out there have not respect for the requests of instructors.

Seriously people need to move on with the time.

Everything is going to end up on Youtube whether you like it or not. This reminds me of fruitless battle the music industry has been waging to protect their music bundling stuff (10 bad songs to sell 2 good songs) on CDs while people continue to swap, steal, download, etc songs of their choice on the Internet.

The instructor has got paid (hopefully) for giving the lessons at the congress. People tape the workshop to remind themselves of what they learnt. So far so good. Now someone decides to put it on the youtube. So what? Is anyone profiting from it? No. Are less people going to attend the next workshop because they can watch the end of workshop on the youtube? No. Are the instructors going to lose money becaue video went on youtube? No. For the students who paid, is the money they paid to take the workshop or attend the congress going to get devalued? No. Are the instructors offering the some workshop as paid content? Unlikely. Is someone going to watch the video for free and pick up something for free? May be. So what? May be the person who watches of free and tries to pickup will like to attend the workshop when it is in their vicinity.

In earlier days you had to pay to advertise your services. The instructors should think of opportunity to have snippet of their workshop being put on youtube by someone else without costing them money or time as free advertising. It is free publicity. It will get you known. If you are not known, no one will bother to attend your workshop when you are in their city. E.g. to best of my knowledge Magna has never been to SF and many around here probably haven't even heard of her. Only reason I know her and admire her dancing is because of youtube and Internet. I rarely take workshops. But if she were to give one around here, not only would I try to go, but also convince 4-5 of my other friends to take it. Those who never heard her name.

And frankly speaking even if my knowledge is to be my source of income, I don't try to hold that knowledge so close to my chest as to not let someone else gain/learn from it. It is not a zero sum game. As an instructor why shouldn't I (note: I am not an instructor) be delighted that some workshop I did in place x, is later available to be seen by rest of the people anywhere in the world?
 
Offbeat said:
Everything is going to end up on Youtube whether you like it or not. This reminds me of fruitless battle the music industry has been waging to protect their music bundling stuff (10 bad songs to sell 2 good songs) on CDs while people continue to swap, steal, download, etc songs of their choice on the Internet.

I don't think the situation with videotaping can be compared to the issue of the music industry. First, in the case of the music industry, in same cases people have violated the laws and then applying the law unto them is fine. And second, the music industry directly started to use available legal tools to stop the violation. But in the case of videotaping, you have people asking for respect to their request and not anybody applying a law.

Offbeat said:
The instructor has got paid (hopefully) for giving the lessons at the congress. People tape the workshop to

But where does that money came from? It's the money that the organizer earned from the people who attend the congress and the workshops. And there's a fair chance that with more clips of workshops showing up for free on the internet, less people will pay for a congress. So there's less money available for instructors, meaning that either less instructor or not well-known instructor or maybe even non will be available for teaching workshops.

Offbeat said:
remind themselves of what they learnt. So far so good. Now someone decides to put it on the youtube. So what? Is anyone profiting from it? No. Are less people going to attend the next workshop because they can watch the end of workshop on the youtube? No. Are the instructors going to lose money becaue video went on youtube? No.

Pardon, but the answer to the first question is in my opinion rather a 'yes' since everybody who watches the clip on the internet is profiting by getting some new combination and/or a new move for free. As to the second issue, I'm not sure if one can assume that free workshop clip will not have an impact on the attendance of workshops. Considering how much money you spend on a congress weekend, I can see how there's a fair chance of less people attending in the future because of this.

Offbeat said:
For the students who paid, is the money they paid to take the workshop or attend the congress going to get devalued? No. Are the instructors offering the some workshop as paid content? Unlikely. Is someone going to

So, let's say when you just bought a new electronic gadget for 500$ and your neighbors shows you he just got the same for free (as it's fallen off a truck ;) will you still be happy about this?

Offbeat said:
In earlier days you had to pay to advertise your services. The instructors should think of opportunity to have snippet of their workshop being put on youtube by someone else without costing them money or time as free advertising. It is free publicity. It will get you known. If you are not known, no one will bother to

Well, if they would see it as opportunity or would like to publish some, they can always bring their own camera along and ask somebody to record it for them or send them the record clip. But do neither, because it doesn't seem like an opportunity for marketing. And personally I'm having some doubts that workshops clips will be an important part of the marketing mix, especially advertising.

Offbeat said:
attend your workshop when you are in their city. E.g. to best of my knowledge Magna has never been to SF and many around here probably haven't even heard of her. Only reason I know her and admire her dancing is because of youtube and Internet. I rarely take workshops. But if she were to give one around here, not only would I try to go, but also convince 4-5 of my other friends to take it. Those who never heard her name.

But those clips on the internet, which made and still make people famous or well-known are those of social dancing and not those of workshops. A 30 second clip showing a combination/pattern will not give you any or only a very slight idea of that dancers style. But watching people dance with various other people will give you good impression and will guide your decision in taking a workshop with them. Or which instructors can you name that got famous because of their workshops clips and only because of it?

In the end, it's about respect for the instructor and his request to you, as workshop participant. They are not asking you or anybody else to pay additional money, sign any contract or something, but instead they offer you the possibility to tape them doing the combination so you can remember it back at home. So why not simply respect the request and the instructor, but instead ignore the request? It the end this kind of behavior will in my opinion not be helpful but rather lead to less and (maybe some day none) instructors allowing videotaping anymore.
 
Bravo Offbeat! Nicely put.

Ditto.

I think a better analogy though is sporting events. I was able to watch the Lakers win the NBA championship on broadcast TV for free. Did that fact affect the market value of championship series tickets? Perhaps, but people were still willing to pay top dollar to be there in person knowing full well that recordings were going on and would be available in the future for a very long time.

I don't think we can equate a recording to a live experience. Not only that, but unlike sports where the event itself unique (e.g. Game 7 of the 2009 NBA Championships featuring team X and team Y which can never happen again since there will never be another 2009), the moves in salsa workshops aren't invented by the demonstrators. They are hashed/rehashed pieces of moves learned here or there, perhaps with personal styling thrown in.

Imagine that I'd never seen or heard of a Suzy Q, but discovered it on my own and started teaching it at workshops. Can I really ask that no one record and share "my" move? Can I be so deluded to think that my classes are completely novel?

chrisk said:
I don't think the situation with videotaping can be compared to the issue of the music industry.

I agree because recorded studio music can be replicated perfectly and disseminated widely. Artists make more money from touring and get recognition from recorded studio music or music videos obtained either legally or illegally. Has the availability of purchased or perfectly replicated studio music dissuaded a fan from attending a concert? Do people think to themselves "I don't want to see the concert, I've got the CD?" I doubt it, and I doubt people who attend salsa workshops think that either.

chrisk said:
But those clips on the internet, which made and still make people famous or well-known are those of social dancing and not those of workshops. A 30 second clip showing a combination/pattern will not give you any or only a very slight idea of that dancers style. But watching people dance with various other people will give you good impression and will guide your decision in taking a workshop with them.

I thought the consensus on this board was that there was little correlation between social dancing ability and teaching ability? I think people who attend workshops because they saw a clip of someone social dancing will be sorely disappointed. Actually now that I think of it, it's probably the reason they bring out the camera in the first place. They didn't learn anything save for a pattern put together in the end. Notice how most of clips are just the pattern at the end. No one posts the tidbits and advice given throughout the workshop. That's where the real value lies.

chrisk said:
Or which instructors can you name that got famous because of their workshops clips and only because of it?
Honestly, I can't sit through an entire ET partnering performance. I am completely fascinated by the clips of his footwork workshops. Other than word of mouth, this has got to be the reason he is over as the "Mambo King."

chrisk said:
In the end, it's about respect for the instructor and his request to you, as workshop participant.

I think this is the real issue. If an instructor or organizer asks you not to record for whatever reason (bad hair day, zit on nose, exclusivity, etc.), it's really on your honor to comply or not.

Is there room, however, to tape yourself executing what was learned in the workshop and uploading it to a video sharing site? What if you do it perfectly with the intended styling? Do you guys think this is acceptable?
 
acpjr said:
I thought the consensus on this board was that there was little correlation between social dancing ability and teaching ability? I think people who attend workshops because they saw a clip of someone social dancing will be sorely disappointed.

I wasn't talking about the teaching ability of somebody, but why they got well-known/famous in the first place. And I don't know or have heard about a single instructor that got famous due to short (20-50 second) clips of his workshops. As far as I know and heard people got famous because of their performance and their social dancing. As to the teaching ability of these person, that's a completely different issue, that I didn't touch upon here. Also when you talk about teaching ability, don't forget that even if the person has it, their style and way of teaching might not be compatible with your way of learning. So in the end even when somebody has a good teaching ability, you might be disappointed because it doesn't fit for you.

acpjr said:
Actually now that I think of it, it's probably the reason they bring out the camera in the first place. They didn't learn anything save for a pattern put together in the end. Notice how most of clips are just the pattern at the end. No one posts the tidbits and advice given throughout the workshop. That's where the real value lies.

Not always, there might be parts of the combination that you can still pick up from a workshop clip or you might have taken some workshops with the instructor before and therefor be able to learn the pattern without those tidbits at all. And let's not forget that with an increasing experience of dancing salsa and an increased knowledge of (basic) moves, it's also easier to learn a new combination, even from a 30 second workshop clip.

acpjr said:
Honestly, I can't sit through an entire ET partnering performance. I am completely fascinated by the clips of his footwork workshops. Other than word of mouth, this has got to be the reason he is over as the "Mambo King."

While I don't doubt that this is true for you personally, I have strong doubts that ET really got famous just because of all those workshop clips of him. Or can anybody really confirm that ET got known as 'Mambo King' for his workshop clips? I think it's rather related to this performance and maybe even his social dancing, although I haven't seen much of this.

acpjr said:
Is there room, however, to tape yourself executing what was learned in the workshop and uploading it to a video sharing site? What if you do it perfectly with the intended styling? Do you guys think this is acceptable?

Personally it still would be violation of the request of the instructor. Just because they don't want to see themselves perfectly executing the combination on YouTube, doesn't mean to me that they like anybody else perfectly executing the combination on YouTube either. I think we should simply honor the request of the instructors, consider the money and time we spend in the workshop, and be happy to have a video clip of the combination we learned to remember it.
 
Imagine that I'd never seen or heard of a Suzy Q, but discovered it on my own and started teaching it at workshops. Can I really ask that no one record and share "my" move? Can I be so deluded to think that my classes are completely novel?






I think this is the real issue. If an instructor or organizer asks you not to record for whatever reason (bad hair day, zit on nose, exclusivity, etc.), it's really on your honor to comply or not.

Is there room, however, to tape yourself executing what was learned in the workshop and uploading it to a video sharing site? Do you guys think this is acceptable?


I thought the Q was addressed to Pros ?...

And in the context it was quoted, its about a " routine ", not just a single variation (I still object to this without permission). And yes, I hope MY classes are to some extent, " novel " .

As to what you have Vid. of your dancing, its not of consequence in the this instance.. sharing it ? thats another matter..

If you attend any world class comp., vid. cameras are forbidden...( even filming Amat. )...
 
The instructor has got paid (hopefully) for giving the lessons at the congress. People tape the workshop to remind themselves of what they learnt. So far so good. Now someone decides to put it on the youtube. So what? Is anyone profiting from it? No. Are less people going to attend the next workshop because they can watch the end of workshop on the youtube? No. Are the instructors going to lose money becaue video went on youtube?
Yes - maybe.
I'm guessing that the thinking behind this "no youtube" thing is:

Workshop material going up on youtube.

-> Less people attending congress workshops ("I can get the same stuff from youtube anyway") and opting for parties only, or not attending congresses at all.

-> Less revenue for congress organisers.

-> Congress organisers downsizing/scrapping workshops in future due to low takeup.

-> Less workshop income for instructors.

I don't know if this is happening or is likely to happen, but it's a possibility.
 
IMO, Congress organizers might make more $ by not allowing taping and selling the vids on the Congress DVD. As an instructor, I would give 5 min at the end to let the students tape each other doing the pattern.
 
Most congresses do have instructors and performers sign a waiver which usually states in no uncertain language that all images of them while at the congress are solely the property of the congress and the congress and only the congress can use those images as they see fit. This would include privately produced images. Most organizers are still stuck in the old outdated IP mode of trying to control content and distribution. This means that they essentially take the side of the content provider (= the instructor, performer). The technology today, however, has surpassed this mode. Even protected dvds are very easy to unlock and copy if people really want to do it.

It is likely that event organizers will eventually consider switching their alliance to the customer by issuing a public use license with every ticket purchase because event dvd sales are miniscule (and are illegally copied and re-distributed) compared to the "free" publicity from youtube and facebook vids.
 
it is actually illegal to post videos of people without obtaining their written permission or a group permission. something to keep in mind....
 
where are you reading this law ?. Source ?

seconded! what country, for a start! Interestingly in the UK photographers have to get "model release forms" signed by people who are in their photographs, yet we have TV shows showing CCTV footage all the time, or news shows with regular citizens walking by in the background. I don't know where the line is drawn.

In Britain at least, original works are automatically copyright their authors, and you could argue then that an improvised social dance is an original work, copyright the dancers who created it.
 
Being able to further one's standing and satisfy self-interest drives innovation.

In today's words, you can equate that with making money.

Taking such stance, distributing via youtube without permission of the source as way things are I argue is more negative over positive.

Same with illegal music sharing.
 
Back
Top