Protests against police violence towards black population in the U.S.

Derek Chauvin (his name means chauvinist in French) had 18 complaints filed against him in the most recent report period. Two complaints were forwarded for disciplinary action.

Per the police union contract, complaints are scrubbed after a period of time, so this record was from 2012 to present. There were 2600 total complaints in the report period. Only 12 were forwarded for disciplinary action. The strongest action taken was a 1 week suspension. 8 actions were written warning letters.

The statistic that could be extracted if all of these numbers are true: Derek Chauvin had 0.7% of the total complaints against the entire police dept but he had 16% of the complaints that led to disciplinary action.
So.... a suspect was 25 times more likely (i.e. 16/0.7) to be abused by Derek Chauvin than be any other typical officer of the Minneapolis Police Dept.

Btw, this information was not distributed by the US media. I got this from my German media source Die Zeit, a weekly journal with thorough reporting standards.

Yes, I am aware of the complaints. I guess what I was suggesting was that perhaps there was something personal that caused the cop to kill Mr. Floyd since they had "bumped heads" while working for the same employer.



 
Last edited:
I can try to screenshot from my digital copy but it is in German.
Apparently the German article comes from several different articles in the NY Times.

"In nearly two decades with the Minneapolis Police Department, Derek Chauvin faced at least 17 misconduct complaints, none of which derailed his career.

Over the years, civilian review boards came and went, and a federal review recommended that the troubled department improve its system for flagging problematic officers.

All the while, Mr. Chauvin tussled with a man before firing two shots, critically wounding him. He was admonished for using derogatory language and a demeaning tone with the public. He was named in a brutality lawsuit. But he received no discipline other than two letters of reprimand.

It was not until Mr. Chauvin, 44, was seen in a video with his left knee pinned to the neck of a black man, prone for nearly nine minutes and pleading for relief, that the officer, who is white, was suspended, fired and then, on Friday, charged with murder."
 
I'm sorry in advance - it's not important at all. But the teacher in me is stronger!
Chauvinist in French is "chauviniste", not chauvin. I'm aware it doesn't matter at all and deeply ashamed not to be stronger than my stupid impulse to correct.
I knew that. I was embellishing. Besides who would want to have any kind of -iste in their name
 
from what i understand, the autopsy report showed that he had both those drugs in his system. if you watch the video of the arrest, he is clearly high.

Sorry, but what you understand is incorrect. I've already demonstrated that no one could provide a link to a reputable source that claims such a thing.

The operative question is "why" is that what you understand. Obviously, someone said it to you, or you read it somewhere. Since it is untrue, perhaps you should question what you current have in your echo chamber That's a question.

I've seen the video more times than I cared to see it. He looks stunned that he was being treated the way he was being treated, if you ask me.

Also, even the same people who perpetuated that farce, ended it by saying something like, "but he still didn't deserve to be killed," so it doesn't matter that such a lie is out there. Well, they are only half right. No, it doesn't matter as it relates to whether or not he should have been killed. Yes, it does matter that such a farcical narrative has been propped up against him, because if not, WHY was it created? Clearly it matters!.
 
Last edited:
Husband and wife conversation:
- Her: Do you love me?
- Him: I love everybody.
- Her: Huh!? I asked you if you love me!
- Her: Do I matter to you?
- Him: Everybody matters to me.
- Her: Huh!? I asked you if I matter to you!


Two random people chatting:
- Her: Black lives matter.
- Him: All lives matter.
- Her: Huh!?


As we see, in some contexts, saying “all lives matter” is a very insensitive thing to say. Or course, all lives matter! Yet, saying that in response to "Black lives matter," is telling about how people really feel.
 
I have one more comment. Everyone should be careful not to perpetuate false narratives. In this thread there were two claims that George Floyd was high on drugs. One that he was on fentinol (spelling?) and another that he was on meth. When asked where that information came from, since I was the news every morning and heard no such thing, the answer was from Wikipedia. Well, that turns out to be absolutely false. Also false was the claim that he had a counterfeit bill that was bleeding.

There are malicious factions in the United States that prop up these lies. People who unknowingly perpetuate it, end up being unknowingly complicit. So, please be careful.


If I recall the autopsy report indicated far higher dose of substance. I am not good with the drug names. It is irrelevant.

How would a 17 year old suspect a counterfeit note? Usually store clerks don't test/check $20 bills for counterfeit. They bleeding part was reported in either WaPo or NYT or CNN on the same day or the very next day the incident happened. Before the protests erupted.
 
If I recall the autopsy report indicated far higher dose of substance. I am not good with the drug names. It is irrelevant.

How would a 17 year old suspect a counterfeit note? Usually store clerks don't test/check $20 bills for counterfeit. They bleeding part was reported in either WaPo or NYT or CNN on the same day or the very next day the incident happened. Before the protests erupted.

Can you provide a link to a reputable source that indicates any of those two things? If it was reported all all three of the ones that you mentioned, it should be easy.
 
Can you provide a link to a reputable source that indicates any of those two things? If it was reported all all three of the ones that you mentioned, it should be easy.

I already did. Scroll up. Lol

Or here....

 
I already did. Scroll up. Lol

Or here....

Thanks.

That is our local paper. It provides the following link where you can download the original copy of the report itself:


However I don’t think it is relevant to the actual incident. If at all it is true that he was incoherent, it means that he wouldn’t have been fully capable of understanding police orders, more the reason for NOT to use overwhelming force. If person is tipsy it is enough to handcuff them at most. Why beat, restrain or anything else!

Like shown in the video above (HBO clip) the cops suddenly rush spraying tear gas directly into the face of protestors. Does that even make sense? What should people do when cops are provocating and behaving illegally.
 
Sorry, but what you understand is incorrect. I've already demonstrated that no one could provide a link to a reputable source that claims such a thing.

The operative question is "why" is that what you understand. Obviously, someone said it to you, or you read it somewhere. Since it is untrue, perhaps you should question what you current have in your echo chamber That's a question.

I've seen the video more times than I cared to see it. He looks stunned that he was being treated the way he was being treated, if you ask me.

Also, even the same people who perpetuated that farce, ended it by saying something like, "but he still didn't deserve to be killed," so it doesn't matter that such a lie is out there. Well, they are only half right. No, it doesn't matter as it relates to whether or not he should have been killed. Yes, it does matter that such a farcical narrative has been propped up against him, because if not, WHY was it created? Clearly it matters!.


no one until me I suppose--unless you want to claim that NPR is unreputable?
 
Some of these replies are so disheartening.

George Floyd is not dead because he was a "criminal" or "high" or "resisting arrest." He is dead because an on-duty police officer murdered him in cold blood in front of witnesses.

To try to denigrate George Floyd's reputation and paint the reaction to his death and the systematic racism and police brutality that facilitated it as disproportionate is beyond callous.

By the way, the system did not "right" itself. The system fired the officers instead of arresting them for a murder that was captured on tape. The initial autopsy report was altered to omit officer wrong doing. Fellow cops guarded the house of the main perpetrator. The fact that there were any charges against the murderers at all was due to people refusing to sweep this injustice under the rug.

In time, businesses in affected areas will open back up, but George Floyd and all those other countless victims of police brutality and racism are never coming back. That should eat away at more people than it does.
 
Some of these replies are so disheartening.

Perhaps you haven't read the whole thread. Everyone has been speaking out against what happened.

To try to denigrate George Floyd's reputation and paint the reaction to his death and the systematic racism and police brutality that facilitated it as disproportionate is beyond callous.

I don't think anyone has called the protest and reaction as disproportiinate
 
Perhaps you haven't read the whole thread. Everyone has been speaking out against what happened.

I definitely read the whole thread.

And, from what I read, not everyone in the thread is speaking out against what happened. One person said it didn't involve him, his country or its problems. Another person brought up Floyd's alleged criminal past and drug use, but did not address how this is victim blaming. Someone else seemed more concerned about looting, as opposed to the loss of life.

I replied because I felt that the focus of the thread had shifted from the bigger issues of injustice and racism to trying to find "facts" about the alleged drugs in Floyd's system. I found that to be disturbing and unhelpful.

I don't think anyone has called the protest and reaction as disproportiinate

Did you see the posts by posters stating that they didn't see the connection between the protests (including the looters) and justice for Floyd? (Even though, as I mentioned in my post, this was the mechanism by which charges were ultimately brought against the perpetrators.) Did you also read the posts worrying about the affect of protesting on the summertime vibe of New York? These type of comments suggest that maintaining the status quo is more important than a lost life, more important than justice.

I hope that you can see my reply as more than a "critique" of the thread, but rather a different analysis of some comments that I don't find to be benign.
 
Back
Top