I can try to screenshot from my digital copy but it is in German.
Yeah, please send it over.
I can try to screenshot from my digital copy but it is in German.
Derek Chauvin (his name means chauvinist in French) had 18 complaints filed against him in the most recent report period. Two complaints were forwarded for disciplinary action.
Per the police union contract, complaints are scrubbed after a period of time, so this record was from 2012 to present. There were 2600 total complaints in the report period. Only 12 were forwarded for disciplinary action. The strongest action taken was a 1 week suspension. 8 actions were written warning letters.
The statistic that could be extracted if all of these numbers are true: Derek Chauvin had 0.7% of the total complaints against the entire police dept but he had 16% of the complaints that led to disciplinary action.
So.... a suspect was 25 times more likely (i.e. 16/0.7) to be abused by Derek Chauvin than be any other typical officer of the Minneapolis Police Dept.
Btw, this information was not distributed by the US media. I got this from my German media source Die Zeit, a weekly journal with thorough reporting standards.
Is it a paid article? I read die Zeit daily and didn't see it.I can try to screenshot from my digital copy but it is in German.
I'm sorry in advance - it's not important at all. But the teacher in me is stronger!Derek Chauvin (his name means chauvinist in French)
Apparently the German article comes from several different articles in the NY Times.I can try to screenshot from my digital copy but it is in German.
I know I read it but could not find it. The original info was from the NY Times.Is it a paid article? I read die Zeit daily and didn't see it.
(I'm not doubting one second it's there, I just didn't see it)
I knew that. I was embellishing. Besides who would want to have any kind of -iste in their nameI'm sorry in advance - it's not important at all. But the teacher in me is stronger!
Chauvinist in French is "chauviniste", not chauvin. I'm aware it doesn't matter at all and deeply ashamed not to be stronger than my stupid impulse to correct.
You make me feel even worse!I knew that. I was embellishing. Besides who would want to have any kind of -iste in their name
from what i understand, the autopsy report showed that he had both those drugs in his system. if you watch the video of the arrest, he is clearly high.
I have one more comment. Everyone should be careful not to perpetuate false narratives. In this thread there were two claims that George Floyd was high on drugs. One that he was on fentinol (spelling?) and another that he was on meth. When asked where that information came from, since I was the news every morning and heard no such thing, the answer was from Wikipedia. Well, that turns out to be absolutely false. Also false was the claim that he had a counterfeit bill that was bleeding.
There are malicious factions in the United States that prop up these lies. People who unknowingly perpetuate it, end up being unknowingly complicit. So, please be careful.
If I recall the autopsy report indicated far higher dose of substance. I am not good with the drug names. It is irrelevant.
How would a 17 year old suspect a counterfeit note? Usually store clerks don't test/check $20 bills for counterfeit. They bleeding part was reported in either WaPo or NYT or CNN on the same day or the very next day the incident happened. Before the protests erupted.
Can you provide a link to a reputable source that indicates any of those two things? If it was reported all all three of the ones that you mentioned, it should be easy.
Sorry, but what you understand is incorrect. I've already demonstrated that no one could provide a link to a reputable source that claims such a thing.
The operative question is "why" is that what you understand. Obviously, someone said it to you, or you read it somewhere. Since it is untrue, perhaps you should question what you current have in your echo chamber That's a question.
I've seen the video more times than I cared to see it. He looks stunned that he was being treated the way he was being treated, if you ask me.
Also, even the same people who perpetuated that farce, ended it by saying something like, "but he still didn't deserve to be killed," so it doesn't matter that such a lie is out there. Well, they are only half right. No, it doesn't matter as it relates to whether or not he should have been killed. Yes, it does matter that such a farcical narrative has been propped up against him, because if not, WHY was it created? Clearly it matters!.
Some of these replies are so disheartening.
To try to denigrate George Floyd's reputation and paint the reaction to his death and the systematic racism and police brutality that facilitated it as disproportionate is beyond callous.
Perhaps you haven't read the whole thread. Everyone has been speaking out against what happened.
I don't think anyone has called the protest and reaction as disproportiinate