One Band's Open Letter to Instructors/DJs

This thread has turned into a bolero thread so I'll take it back to the Conjunto Oye FB OP.
I bolded the sentences that I think the OP was really trying to convey. The idea that playing older rhythms like bolero and danzon and cha-cha and (not specifically mentioned) son is what they used to be able to do and the dancers would be able to adapt. According to the OP, today that doesn't happen anymore.
Also it appears that the OP has a problem with "pop music with tropical window dressing".

I am interpreting the OP's complaint as 2 different things.
1. Dance Instructors, DJs (and Bands) are not adding anything beyond the very basics. The basic salsa, the basic bachata, the standard rhythm arrangement, the whatever it takes to get people on the dance floor and no more than that, is all they want to offer and is all their customers ask for.
2. The decline in musical quality, i.e. pop music with tropical dressing, seems like a complaint towards composers and arrangers who don't use acoustic instruments anymore due to the high cost of hiring an actual musician to play them at a recording quality level. A synth player can pull it off as long as they know how to program a keyboard.

I would generally agree with both complaints but the 2nd one does not have to be. DJs can choose whatever track or covered song they want and if they pick a live cut with all its weird breaks, they can change the flow of a song and what dancers might do (if they are listening).

*************************************************************************
This is an open letter to all Los Angeles dance instructors and DJ's.

The world is ever evolving. Trends come and go. Some things stay and others go quickly. Salsa (tropical dance music) has never left us. Though It changes, though it goes through various levels of popularity, it has survived.

It has not died (or at least completely died) because it is a musical art form that deserves to live. It is something that indeed makes life worth living. It is a recharge for your soul. It is important. More than that, it is vital.

As such, it is important to remember that we (as part of the community) have a certain responsibility to make sure that the traditions are passed down correctly to the succeeding generations. As time marches on, most of the masters that created this art form have passed on. We must make sure that what they created doesn't also pass, into oblivion.

This does not mean that you need to be a revivalist. Music is supposed to change. But just because music changes, that does not mean that we can afford to forget rhythms and other key elements that made the music what it is.

Historically the musicians (and authors of this music) have had a symbiotic relationship with dancers. They created the music and the dancers individually found it within themselves to create dance.

Every time a new rhythm was created, the dancers followed. Mambo came from an older rhythm (the guaguanco). The Cha Cha came from the older Danzon. Rhythms of more African origin were refined into modern incarnations (Mozambique, Bomba, Plena, Jala Jala, Comparsa). Every time one of these rhythms came onto the scene, the dancers were able to adapt. The further away from these rhythms (and Africa for that matter) that you get, the further away you get from what Salsa is. Salsa is not supposed to be pop music with tropical window dressing.

It seems that dancers are less and less equipped these days to deal with these rhythms (all of which fall under the umbrella term of "salsa"). There was a time when a band couldn't get away with not playing a Bolero. When a band played a bolero, It was the time of the night when dancers were really able to get close to one another.

Bachata seems to be what dancers use to do this these days, when they want to dance close. That's all well and good. But it is a mistake to let Bachata entirely take the place of these other dances that are part of the salsa tradition. Bachata has very little to do with salsa. It is not salsa. This is not to say that there is no place for Bachata. Dancers want what they want. But give them options. Don't forget to teach dancers how to handle a Cha Cha Cha. Equip them to handle a Bolero. It would be a shame to let these traditions die on our watch.

This is of course just a reminder. We musicians would have nothing without the continued support of promoters, dancers, DJ's, music lovers, and everybody else in the salsa community.
 
Bolero is an old peoples dance, just like merengue :troll:
lol...that is so not true...no offense but that is the kind of mentality that destroys certain music and dance genres...Bolero has the 3 SSS...Sensual,Slow and Sexy....It is awesome to dance to. Merengue is great also....if you don't enjoy these dances either you don't know how to dance them or you are doing it wrong! Totally not an "old" peoples dance. I am not old and I dance to boleros and merengues and love them both!
 
Add La Lupe , Omara Portuondo , Aldo Mata and Cheito among many others with great music lying dorment.

Some of Machito's boleros are superb. Plus every Latin jazz album from back in the day seems to have at least one instrumental bolero; these might make it more palatable to today's (so-called) mambo crowd
 
Bolero is an old peoples dance, just like merengue :troll:

So's salsa in general. If you want to follow the latest fashions, you've picked a strange choice of forum.

Ironically the majority of people who I have seen desert salsa for bachata then kizomba are the older dancers.
 
So's salsa in general. If you want to follow the latest fashions, you've picked a strange choice of forum.

Ironically the majority of people who I have seen desert salsa for bachata then kizomba are the older dancers.
Interesting. Around here the average age of salsa dancers is definitely lower than the average age of tango dancers. I would say the average level of experience is less too. Most of the people here that moved to bachata and then kizomba tended to be in the middle.
 
Bolero is an old peoples dance, just like merengue :troll:

You talkin to me ?o_O ....:D..

Seriously. I guess you have not seen the Championship levels in this dance held in Fl. ALL the Pros are probably under 30 yrs of age.

And on the merengue.. As you probably know ,in the latino clubs it packs the floor more than Salsa , with young and older dancers !! :dancingbanana:
 
I meant that bachata was related to bolero musically (deriving from it). I was under the impression (maybe I am off on this) that it was generally accepted that bachata (and I do mean going back to the earlier bachata--though to me the musical connection is still obvious even in most current pop bachata) derives from bolero. There were some pretty interesting discussions about this in the Yahoo group Salseros Collective. I'm not sure if that's still running. (Actually Richie Rumbero had some even more specific theories, with examples provided, about the Puerto Rican contribution to the transformation of bolero into bachata.)

Otherwise, I haven't read any scholarly articles, let alone books, on bachata, so I don't have a lot to point to.
 
I meant that bachata was related to bolero musically (deriving from it). I was under the impression (maybe I am off on this) that it was generally accepted that bachata (and I do mean going back to the earlier bachata--though to me the musical connection is still obvious even in most current pop bachata) derives from bolero. There were some pretty interesting discussions about this in the Yahoo group Salseros Collective. I'm not sure if that's still running. (Actually Richie Rumbero had some even more specific theories, with examples provided, about the Puerto Rican contribution to the transformation of bolero into bachata.)

Otherwise, I haven't read any scholarly articles, let alone books, on bachata, so I don't have a lot to point to.
Most definitely derives from bolero...it was called bolero long before it received the name Bachata.
 
I meant that bachata was related to bolero musically (deriving from it). I was under the impression (maybe I am off on this) that it was generally accepted that bachata (and I do mean going back to the earlier bachata--though to me the musical connection is still obvious even in most current pop bachata) derives from bolero. There were some pretty interesting discussions about this in the Yahoo group Salseros Collective. I'm not sure if that's still running. (Actually Richie Rumbero had some even more specific theories, with examples provided, about the Puerto Rican contribution to the transformation of bolero into bachata.)

Otherwise, I haven't read any scholarly articles, let alone books, on bachata, so I don't have a lot to point to.

modern pop bachata does not sound nothing near like bolero if that was the case bolero will be as popular as bachata is :p,earlier (like you said) most def does.
 
You talkin to me ?o_O ....:D..

Seriously. I guess you have not seen the Championship levels in this dance held in Fl. ALL the Pros are probably under 30 yrs of age.

And on the merengue.. As you probably know ,in the latino clubs it packs the floor more than Salsa , with young and older dancers !! :dancingbanana:

this is very true in latino clubs merengue get people off their seat more so than salsa,people of all ages as well.
 
I LOVE MERENGUE! That might be a surprise to some people, but I absolutely love it! It was the preferred "filler" before bachata became popular.

Since it seems much easier to dance than salsa, bachata and cha-cha-chá, there is not a market for the instructors. Therefore, the instructors did not / do not embrace it. So, studio trained dancers and instructors are generally not into merengue.

As mentioned here already though, vernacular Latin dancers still love it; old and young!

By the way, it only appears to be easy to dance. I've seen a lot of people do that stiff side-to-side, awkward movement, to merengue. Merengue is such a smooth and enjoyable dance when the couple knows how to "sway."
 
I LOVE MERENGUE! That might be a surprise to some people, but I absolutely love it! It was the preferred "filler" before bachata became popular.

Since it seems much easier to dance than salsa, bachata and cha-cha-chá, there is not a market for the instructors. Therefore, the instructors did not / do not embrace it. So, studio trained dancers and instructors are generally not into merengue.

As mentioned here already though, vernacular Latin dancers still love it; old and young!

By the way, it only appears to be easy to dance. I've seen a lot of people do that stiff side-to-side, awkward movement, to merengue. Merengue is such a smooth and enjoyable dance when the couple knows how to "sway."

I love merengue too, at least for dancing to. I don't tend to be interested in just listening to most of it.

I think it is genuinely easy to dance (it's more forgiving than salsa, anyway), but that doesn't mean there isn't plenty you can do with it, particularly in terms of overall body movement, as I think you pointed out.
 
...that needs a complete understanding of CBM, and HOW to use it effectively .

May I respectfully request that when you use an acronym like this (CMB) you give the long form in parentheses afterwards.

For example in this instance I'm left guessing: Centre of Body Mass??

As a dividend for yourself, you might find more people will understand your posts.
If you're interested in educating others, which I suspect, this will help.
 
May I respectfully request that when you use an acronym like this (CMB) you give the long form in parentheses afterwards.

For example in this instance I'm left guessing: Centre of Body Mass??

As a dividend for yourself, you might find more people will understand your posts.
If you're interested in educating others, which I suspect, this will help.

Yep, I do sometimes use assumption, but primarily because those who read posts on this ( and dance forums in general ) are usually well exposed to acronym, and those that aren't, ask..

But, I take your point..

By the way, it's CBM ( Contra body motion )
 
And what *is* contra body motion ?

The action where the leg moving forward has a direct opposite action to the body side..i.e. Left foot steps, Right side of body ( like when one walks ).. there are other combos. Left foot and left side " leads ", and Right foot, right side "leads " of body.

Contra body motion should be "sympathetic " and not overt whereas left side/right side leads are more dominant .
 
But, I take your point..

By the way, it's CBM ( Contra body motion )

Thanks. I've noticed you use a lot of acronyms and this isn't the first time I've been puzzled by them. I assert that most people will not take the time and effort to ask *unless* the post you're making is absolutely central to a debate they're having with you or an interest of theirs.
 
Thanks. I've noticed you use a lot of acronyms and this isn't the first time I've been puzzled by them. I assert that most people will not take the time and effort to ask *unless* the post you're making is absolutely central to a debate they're having with you or an interest of theirs.


Pretty much all teachers use them, and when introduced to a new class for e.g., then,the full name is ascribed . Plus, it is also shown physically what the "action " does, and its reason for being .

You may also have seen " CM".. Cuban motion, again, common usage .

I'm not sure, but, there may be a glossary of terms on the site .( If not, would be a good idea to list, with explanations and some applications ) .
 
Back
Top