It may be salsa, but not as we know it, Jim

I like to observe and study salsa teachers, and by chance and serendipity I've lately been following with interest two salsa beginners' classes run by qualified ballroom Latin professional teachers and dancers. Both female.

As one would expect, they have been very good on frame, hold, correct stepping for 'latin motion', use of centre. And classy followers, exquisite turns, spins, decorative hands etc.

But on some other things: e.g. (On1):

- counting 1,2,3 .... 4,5,6 over the two four-beat bars (disconnecting from the beats in the music, as opposed to 123..567);
- sawing their arms about in open hold (breaks connection with partner);
- one of them taught that on the lady's forward basic step she leads the man, mirroring his lead to her on his forward step;
- instructing that an open-out was led by throwing the follower's hand backwards (moot point: there are better ways IMO);
- picking a hard-to-lead, mostly choreographed chachacha move to teach beginners in lesson 2.
- telling the ladies that their left arm can extend way behind the man's neck in closed hold (in AT-like manner) (IMO this restricts movement in salsa and isn't really the lady's decision... )
- on a cbl with single outside turn, leading the lady to turn on the 5 rather than the 6

What do you think about these?

I like the fact that salsa is a broad church with many different ways of doing things. But I fear that these observations only reinforced my view that as salsa is not a ballroom latin dance, ballroom latin experts can be inadvisable teachers if they are not also keen social salsa dancers. At least on the leading and following aspects that work freestyle, as opposed to choreographed and rehearsed movements.

I now recall also that in the first series of Strictly Come Dancing where salsa was introduced, series 3, the dances were hardly recognisable as salsa, and the judges' views of the dance were not in accordance with what we all see and love when salsa is danced well. When SCD started to contract salsa specialists such as Richard Marcel to advise on choreography, things improved greatly and SCD salsa can be of a high standard these days.
 
Flex said:
I now recall also that in the first series of Strictly Come Dancing where salsa was introduced, series 3, the dances were hardly recognisable as salsa, and the judges' views of the dance were not in accordance with what we all see and love when salsa is danced well. When SCD started to contract salsa specialists such as Richard Marcel to advise on choreography, things improved greatly and SCD salsa can be of a high standard these days.

Flex, I find it very interesting that you think things have improved since Richard Marcel became involved. I do not know how much you know about Richard's background, but he has a Ballroom/Latin dance background. Have met Richard on a couple of occassions and he was/is a pleasant guy. But, he is still Ballroom/Latin background.

From recollection, a couple of the teachers who were involved in previous years were... Cuban salsa dancers, ie. from Cuba. Fantastic dancers in their own right and the choreography for their own shows is beautiful.

I think they would have contributed equally to SCD, but is it possible that their ideas/suggestions could have been watered down because they do not have/share the connections/rapport Richard has with the Ballroom/Latin fraternity...?

Is it also possible, that it may have been 'timing'? ie. I believe a few people from the salsa community here in the UK have complained ;) and are still awaiting responses from the BBC :lol: But, maybe, just maybe, they are acting on it? In addition, I think you may find that there are still a few people who think that what is being done on SCD is NOT salsa, including the selection of music which continues to fry the brain!
 
When I first started Salsa I was taught by a ballroom/latin teacher and although I don't want to tar them all with the same brush, this particular teacher taught me bad habits more than anything else :(. The list you gave sounds very familiar and she also used to say things like 'Ladies, you know what is coming so help the leader by doing it' :roll:.

I didn't know any different (she didn't advertise or encourage social dancing outside her own classes or events) so when I finally went to a good teacher I was way worse than the complete beginners because I had to break my bad habits and start again :oops:.
 
Pacion said:
Flex, I find it very interesting that you think things have improved since Richard Marcel became involved. I do not know how much you know about Richard's background, but he has a Ballroom/Latin dance background. Have met Richard on a couple of occassions and he was/is a pleasant guy. But, he is still Ballroom/Latin background.
Yes, indeed; but he is also a reasonable salsa teacher, good social salsa dancer and quite frequently to be seen with his brother Paul who is a good salsa teacher (not such a good dancer and not such a good choreographer as Richard in my view). Paul was also involved in the background of SCD salsa recently.

I'm saying that ballroom Latin experts may be OK in teaching salsa if they are also keen social salsa dancers themselves.
From recollection, a couple of the teachers who were involved in previous years were... Cuban salsa dancers, ie. from Cuba. Fantastic dancers in their own right and the choreography for their own shows is beautiful.
I can't recall their names, but e.g. the last ones that choreographed the group merengue really blew it!
I think they would have contributed equally to SCD, but is it possible that their ideas/suggestions could have been watered down because they do not have/share the connections/rapport Richard has with the Ballroom/Latin fraternity...
Interesting observation - and yes, quite possible I think.
Is it also possible, that it may have been 'timing'? ie. I believe a few people from the salsa community here in the UK have complained ;) and are still awaiting responses from the BBC :lol: But, maybe, just maybe, they are acting on it? In addition, I think you may find that there are still a few people who think that what is being done on SCD is NOT salsa, including the selection of music which continues to fry the brain!
Well, the choice of music in several of the genres has been simply appalling - I was told a year or so ago that the BBC themselves had a heavy hand in picking things they believed would be easily recognisable to the average viewer... However, a few of the tracks - I recall at least one genuine AT track LOL - were passable in the last series.

If you look again at the routines by Mark Ramprakash / Karen, and latterly Matt & Flavia's, then at least there are passages of recognisable salsa dancing and some respectable and quite crisply executed moves in these show dances. Whereas series 3 was just abominable, I seem to remember!
 
Pacion said:
If your profile photo is anything to go by, did you take up drumming to relieve the stress? ;)

Nah, that's how she taught me to move my arms while doing my basics, someone just put the drums in front of me while I was dancing once, I made sweet music and never stopped ;)
 
Flex said:
Pacion said:
Flex, I find it very interesting that you think things have improved since Richard Marcel became involved. I do not know how much you know about Richard's background, but he has a Ballroom/Latin dance background. Have met Richard on a couple of occassions and he was/is a pleasant guy. But, he is still Ballroom/Latin background.
Yes, indeed; but he is also a reasonable salsa teacher, good social salsa dancer and quite frequently to be seen with his brother Paul who is a good salsa teacher (not such a good dancer and not such a good choreographer as Richard in my view). Paul was also involved in the background of SCD salsa recently.

I am not disagreeing there - yes, he is a reasonable teacher, social dancer etc but, I still think he had an edge of 'acceptablitily' over others who are possibly equally good or even better teachers but dealing with a 'different kettle of fish' in terms of the students - ie. ballroom/latin versus 'Joe Public' of the street...

Flex said:
Well, the choice of music in several of the genres has been simply appalling - I was told a year or so ago that the BBC themselves had a heavy hand in picking things they believed would be easily recognisable to the average viewer...

From something I heard, the BBC didn't have a heavy hand in picking, they actually picked the songs and then the professional had to choose from that!

If they wanted tracks the audience could have recognised, they could have chosen 'Lady in Red' for example :lol: or a Gloria Estefan, Ricky Martin, Gypsy Kings... anything other than some of the rotten eggs they threw at the viewers.

Flex said:
If you look again at the routines by Mark Ramprakash / Karen, and latterly Matt & Flavia's, then at least there are passages of recognisable salsa dancing and some respectable and quite crisply executed moves in these show dances. Whereas series 3 was just abominable, I seem to remember!

Look again? :lol: I haven't even see the performances! I am one of those who was soooo disillusioned I haven't really looked at it since, umm, the cricketer Darren (what's his name) (Series three I think?), won. I think I was/am in 'silent protest' :lol: a) at the choice of music b) that there were contestants taking part who looked as if they did in fact have some sort of prior dance training whereas I had understood from the first series they were not to have had any dance training. Similar for Strictly Dance Fever. :|
 
Pacion said:
I haven't even see the performances! I am one of those who was soooo disillusioned ..

I don't think we're all that far apart LOL!

youtube.com/watch?v=Oii94hMC92k gives Ramps performance ,
youtube.com/watch?v=f8ChlTtS7S0 gives Matt's. Neither had prior dance experience of any kind AFAIK. After a few weeks' training on several widely different dances... what do you think? (Sure the music is a very poor choice by the Beeb, but...)
 
Jambo... :roll: :nope: :lol: I almost believed you... almost! :lol:

:lol: Okay Flex, had a quick look at the YouTube clips.

Am partial to calypso in any event and I also recognise the song Matt & Flavia danced to as one I have salsa danced to (attempted to dance to!). Definitely a "10" on the music for those two clips.

I also saw Karen do some reggaeton moves. The one thing I didn't like was the 'rag doll' type move she did. Otherwise, both dances were a tremendous improvement on previous years... I think my brains were only partially fried this time ;)
 
Pacion said:
:lol: Okay Flex, had a quick look at the YouTube clips.

Am partial to calypso in any event and I also recognise the song Matt & Flavia danced to as one I have salsa danced to (attempted to dance to!). Definitely a "10" on the music for those two clips.

I also saw Karen do some reggaeton moves. The one thing I didn't like was the 'rag doll' type move she did. Otherwise, both dances were a tremendous improvement on previous years... I think my brains were only partially fried this time ;)

Not so keen on samba / calypso type tracks myself. The rag doll (if that's what you call the lady being dangled around by her mid-back while shimmying) isn't one of my favourites either, but got them trhough a couple of bars where the celeb lead didn't have to do anything while his pro partner looked good. It's also a move that can look good in e.g. bachata.

Neat neck drop by Ramps though - I like doing those when the everlovin' seems to be falling asleep; and a few crisp moves from Matt plus that fairly awesome rollover by the amazingly fit Flavia.

So - it has got better!
 
Ballroom people constantly criticize each other's teaching styles and dancing styles and technique, so obviously it is a heterogeneous field in itself. It's not surprising that when ballroom people start teaching salsa, there will be even more disagreements over styling and technique. A good teacher, in any field, is one who can present the pure basics, unpolluted by his/her own style, so that the students can have a firm technical foundation on which to build their own style.
 
It would be good if some shows on TV that portrayed Salsa in a ballroom fashion had a disclaimer stating that Ballroom is NOT Salsa, but a version of it designed by ballroom dancers to assist with their method of dancing/coreography.

People gain the perception of salsa as being a ballroom dance which is actually a pity and in my opinion portays salsa in a bad light.

Ballroom imho is not dancing, but a choreographed series of moves desinged for show. I apologise to anyone who might take offense to this but it is entirely my own opinion.

Ballroom teachers should not be allowed to teach salsa unless explicitly advertise it as being of the ballroom variety.
 
Pacion said:
If they wanted tracks the audience could have recognised, they could have chosen 'Lady in Red' for example :lol: or a Gloria Estefan, Ricky Martin, Gypsy Kings... anything other than some of the rotten eggs they threw at the viewers.

... and all the time the theme tune to SCD is salsa!
 
sweavo said:
Pacion said:
If they wanted tracks the audience could have recognised, they could have chosen 'Lady in Red' for example :lol: or a Gloria Estefan, Ricky Martin, Gypsy Kings... anything other than some of the rotten eggs they threw at the viewers.

... and all the time the theme tune to SCD is salsa!

Oh really!!!???!!! You could have knocked me down with a feather! :lol: Do educate me some more. Name and singer/band please. :lol:

(If I may borrow the name of this thread: It may be salsa, but not as we know it, Sweavo!)
 
Pacion said:
sweavo said:
.....and all the time the theme tune to SCD is salsa!

Oh really!!!???!!! You could have knocked me down with a feather! :lol: Do educate me some more. Name and singer/band please. :lol:

V. amusing. I think sweavo may have in mind that the basic dah-de-dah-dah, dah-de-dah is a clear 3:2 clave rhythm. Now I come to address this novel point....
 
Jag75 said:
Ballroom imho is not dancing, but a choreographed series of moves designed for show. I apologise to anyone who might take offense to this but it is entirely my own opinion.

What are the comments of ballroom experts on this? I think that there's a strong element of choreography, rehearsal and practice in ballroom, particularly for competition. But ballroom dances are also danced socially, led and followed.

Ballroom and ballroom Latin teachers are maybe more of the competition variety. (?)

It also seems to me that because the ballroom dances are codified and certain things are expected / allowed / disallowed because of the competition aspect, they are made more limited in scope, and variety of moves, than our lovely evolving salsa. And rather more artificial. Nonetheless beautiful (especially the slow foxtrot).

It's one of the reasons why I am very wary when the competitive aspect creeps into salsa. And also wary of attempts to establish salsa authorities of whatever sort to e.g. regulate teaching. I acknowledge that the downside of this is a range of idiosyncratic and often poor teachers. But as far as I can see, qualified ballroom teachers can also be poor salsa teachers.

Ballroom teachers should not be allowed to teach salsa unless explicitly advertise it as being of the ballroom variety.

I can't agree with this kind of draconian regulation! Qualified ballroom pros can be good salsa teachers, but only if they also are keen and requally proficient social salsa dancers in addition to their ballroom activities.

PS I just love that quirky Australian movie 'Strictly Ballroom.' Says it all about the rules, the hierarchy, the squabbles. And of course about the contrast of stilted ballroom with the real connection, the real rhythm, the natural dancing especially in the wonderful Paso Doble of Fran's Latino father on the decking next to the railway line...
 
sweavo said:
Pacion said:
If they wanted tracks the audience could have recognised, they could have chosen 'Lady in Red' for example :lol: or a Gloria Estefan, Ricky Martin, Gypsy Kings... anything other than some of the rotten eggs they threw at the viewers.

... and all the time the theme tune to SCD is salsa!

I was absolutely fuming when the SAMBA show dance by Vincent and Flavia was danced to the Gypsy Kings :?

I love Flamenco (I dance Sevillianas) but it ain't Samba.
 
DeeplyDippy said:
sweavo said:
Pacion said:
If they wanted tracks the audience could have recognised, they could have chosen 'Lady in Red' for example :lol: or a Gloria Estefan, Ricky Martin, Gypsy Kings... anything other than some of the rotten eggs they threw at the viewers.

... and all the time the theme tune to SCD is salsa!

I was absolutely fuming when the SAMBA show dance by Vincent and Flavia was danced to the Gypsy Kings :?

I love Flamenco (I dance Sevillianas) but it ain't Samba.

Samba, according to whose definitions? A Brazilian's or a Latin dancer? ;)

I was thinking about some of the music discussion yesterday and this morning and laughing. Here I am 'turning up my nose' at some of the music selections made by the BBC, yet, I will happily dance salsa to almost anything that has a 4/4 beat. Yet, there are salsa 'experts' who would turn their nose up at what I was doing! :doh: Ah... the complexities of life! :lol:

(But, one has to admit that if it is not the actual song that is at fault, it is probably the musical arrangement... says a non musician! :lol:)
 
DeeplyDippy said:
...... show dance by Vincent and Flavia

Ah, but wasn't their show Viennese Waltz terrific?

I've never done the VW and always hated it as a spectacle, a boring dance. The everlovin' who spent a few years in Vienna, loves it of course.

But Vincent and Flavia's was magic - the highes tpoint of the last series for me!

Credit where it's due. And they are two of my fave dancers around these parts, especially Argentine tango.
 
Back on topic...

My take on the Flex's original question is thus...

Flex said:
- counting 1,2,3 .... 4,5,6 over the two four-beat bars (disconnecting from the beats in the music, as opposed to 123..567);
In the intial stages this isn't a problem, other than if the students go elsewhere they may get confused when other teachers say 567 instead of 456. However, what about when we start doing footwork that uses all four counts? Or pre-leading on four to give the lady one count notice for whatever it is we want her to do on five? Also the whole concept is that in beginners, we pause (or more correctly flow) through the four and the eight, but we ain't waltzing!

Flex said:
- sawing their arms about in open hold (breaks connection with partner);
This is one of my pet hates and I know my partner feels the same. It's something I'm forever attempting to beat out of students that come to us from other classes. However, I know many accomplished dancers who do this. In fact one of the most respected teachers in the country (voted most popular teacher at last year's UK Congress) can be seen doing this on his instructional DVD! To be honest, I've never noticed him doing it when free dancing, and if my students started dancing like he does in every respect, then I'd be well happy. It tends to be a more typically Cuban thing but there are loads of Cross-Body style dancers who do it too. Personally I hate it!

Flex said:
- one of them taught that on the lady's forward basic step she leads the man, mirroring his lead to her on his forward step;
Aaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrgggggghhhhhhh!!!!
No! Tell me it isn't so!!!

Flex said:
- instructing that an open-out was led by throwing the follower's hand backwards (moot point: there are better ways IMO);
I actually don't have a problem with this. Yeah sure there are better ways to do it, but for a first time beginner in his frst ever lesson, he's got little chance of understanding how to effectively steer an equally novice follower through use of reflected tension whilst still strying to figure out what's supposed to be goin on with his feet. In the very early stages at least, "throw her away" is a lot more meanginful and easier to understand and pull off successfully.

Flex said:
- picking a hard-to-lead, mostly choreographed chachacha move to teach beginners in lesson 2.
I've got very much my own ideas about what should be taught in beginners (see published syllabus on our site for details). I'm not saying it's right, but it works for us. I know I was horrified :shock: a few months ago when a fellow teacher at a congress told me he'd attempted to teach brand new first time beginners a basic copa because he wanted to give them something they could use on the dance floor later that evening! :? :!: :?
Having said this, I believe that some element of choreograhy gives beginners a framework and structure within which to learn, but of course it should be explained that move should be led and followed within that choreography. And it shouldn't be too difficult.

Flex said:
- telling the ladies that their left arm can extend way behind the man's neck in closed hold (in AT-like manner) (IMO this restricts movement in salsa and isn't really the lady's decision... )
Erm, no. don't tell 'em that.
Maybe (maybe) later on, when you're looking at opportunities where they are up real close and personal and they wish to reflect that, as long as they aren't clinging limpet like and can release instantly as the leader changes his hold to do something else.

Flex said:
- on a cbl with single outside turn, leading the lady to turn on the 5 rather than the 6
Ha. Gotcha!
On a CBL with and outside (1.5 x right) turn, the girl's first turn step is into the five, and I actually endorse "pre-leading" this on the four to give her a moment's notice.
If however we're talking about a simple "Outside Cross Body" where the girl only does a half right turn, then she needs to turn either into her five step (led as she steps into five) or into her seven step (led AFTER 6 as she steps into seven) so that we're working WITH the follower's natural movement and not against it.
 
Back
Top