sweavo
Changui
Flex said:No, no - we can't spell correctly over here
u dno wot ur torkin bout innit!
Flex said:No, no - we can't spell correctly over here
UnlikelySalsero said:Edie has it right; most guys don't take the time to understand the music, instead working on their turn patterns.
Because music has structure, once someone knows the overall structure they can predict the hills/valleys, hit and breaks with a high degree of accuracy, even on new songs. Most guys can learn this in months and practice it regularly in their car on the drive to/from work and the clubs.
The problem is few instructors teach the music structure AND in group classes, many guys just want more turn patterns. They get bothered if an instructor takes the time to explain how the music is structured. Some of that is an intellectual discussion and takes listening to music multiple times. Guys often want more steps and less talking, so most instructors imply the music is important, but don’t break down the details in group classes.
Many guys don't even want to count out loud when practicing, and that is foundational IF you want to understand the music structure.
Disclosure: I teach with Edie at her LA boot camps. I'm hardly objective about her teaching and methods.
UnlikelySalsero said:noobster said:I tend to take my cues re musical interpretation from my partner: if he is more ballroomy vs more street vs more energetic vs more reserved, whatever it is my movements usually move more in that direction too. And if he is churning me through patterns without a lot of attention to the music, I tend to cooperate with that as well, toning down the musicality (though not losing it completely).
More mature leads often modify their style to compliment the woman, and if done correctly they feed off each other like a conversation... You get more energetic, so do I and we feed off each other. If we are both paying attention what you do should influence my choices and movements.
noobster said:On the other hand, I very rarely see a guy pick up any cues from *me*. Doubtless that's mostly because they've got lots of other things to think about, but I bet it is also because they are used to being the 'talkers' in the conversation. They are often 'listening' to the extent that they are trying to make sure I am having a good time, which is wonderful and I'm very happy about that - but they are not usually listening to what I think about the music.
That would take a pretty mature lead to pull that off. For example, I may instantly recognize you have a cuban influence. I know what that looks like, but I don't currently have the motion vocabulary (control) to pull that off and integrate it into my dancing (yet). I dance with one follow who has a hip-hop background. I see her doing body/arm waves that would be perfect for me to reflect back to her at points, but I don't have enough control to make that happen at this point (I'm working on it...)
On the other hand, if I see you have a strong movement vocabulary, I may put you in more positions or patterns where I know you'll have the time to show off your vocabulary. In other words, while I may not be able to reflect your current style, I may give more room for your expression to show through.
Mature leads modify their pattern selection based on their follow.
noobster said:I've seen myself on video with six or seven different partners over time and I look like a different dancer with each one. Leaders don't change their look much with different followers - and I'm not talking about their pattern vocabulary, I'm talking about their movement vocabulary.
That makes sense to me, followers from the start tend to invest more time in their movement vocabulary while the guys are focused on their pattern vocabulary in the beginning. (A generalization.) Most guys build out from their patterns, while most ladies build from their style. (That doesn't fit everybody!)
noobster said:I guess what I'm trying to say is that musicality *could* be a two-way conversation - unlike patterns, which are a one-way conversation where he talks and I listen - but it very, very rarely turns out that way in practice. I think that could be different, but it would require the leader not only to slow down on the patterns (and there are lots of very attentive and musical leaders around here, I would not say that pattern-monkeys are in any way a majority) but actually to pay attention to the woman's interpretation of the music and try to incorporate it into what he's doing. That second bit is much rarer and, I would guess, much harder for someone who is not used to being the listener in the conversation.
You are correct, the dance should be a conversation. Note that just because I understand the concepts intellectually, as a lead I may not have the ability to react in real time and modify my dance to hold up my end of the conversation.
Sometimes I hear things in the music and/or see my partner and I can't respond fast enough or maybe I don't have the body control required to express what I'm feeling in response to your movements.
I can sit here on the board and I recognize the concepts (salsa dance closely parellels many jazz concepts) but that doesn't mean I have the physical skills to execute the right feel for my partner and the music.
noobster said:Well. I don't consider the patterns to be the main component of the musicality. IMHO you can have a really beautiful, musical dance with just three patterns. <snip>
We are on the same page here... except the same pattern can be executed with many different feels. Most women can say the words "I hate you" (or "I love you") with a tone that can be whispered in a sexy tone or screaming and in the "I'll rip your head off" tone. Same words, a wide range of feelings.
noobster said:My point is that if he had been listening to what I thought about the song he wouldn't have given me that spin in the first place.
Absolutely yes! I agree that the selection of moves/patterns should be appropriate for the woman and the song, and fit the conversation.
noobster said:So yes, the leader usually 'sets the tone for the dance.' But that's a contingent fact, not a theoretical constraint. It doesn't have to be that way. Musicality can be a two-way street, but both dancers have to be listening.
In an ideal world, it should be a conversation with the music providing the context. Most of the time the lead sets the tone, although I totally agree with you that the dance should be a conversation. It may not be today if I don't have the overall vocabulary to express my feelings, but over time it is moving in that direction.
Offbeat said:UnlikelySalsero said:Edie has it right; most guys don't take the time to understand the music, instead working on their turn patterns.
Because music has structure, once someone knows the overall structure they can predict the hills/valleys, hit and breaks with a high degree of accuracy, even on new songs. Most guys can learn this in months and practice it regularly in their car on the drive to/from work and the clubs.
The problem is few instructors teach the music structure AND in group classes, many guys just want more turn patterns. They get bothered if an instructor takes the time to explain how the music is structured. <snip>
In which case may I ask what percentage of time is spent at the boot camp/class regarding music, its structure, what dancing to the music means, how it can make difference in dancing, etc.
Offbeat said:I think it is wrong to blame that guys want to learn the turn patterns only. That is a circular argument. Most beginners and especially those who haven't grown up listening to latin/salsa music don't know what they don't know. May be beginners think that patterns are most important because that is what is taught in the class, that is what they see their instructors demonstrate, that is what they see most of the crowd doing on the social dance floor or in the performance. So how would someone coming in to salsa actually get to learn that dancing is more than just churning out turn patterns. And even if they were to realize this on their own, where should they turn to learn it?
Offbeat said:If there is a lack of musicality in the lot of beginners/intermediate salsa dancers I will squarely blame the instructor community for this. When I use to learn AT almost all instructors (I must have attended classes from over dozen instructors) would begin by emphasizing dancing to the music from the very first class. Most will simply make you walk to the music rather than try to rush students in to orchos, sakatas, etc. They would explain that embellishments in that dance form are to express the music. Shouldn't Eddie be addressing this to the instructor community first? Can I stretch the argument and say that the salsa instructor community at large has failed the dancers by putting them in wrong direction from the very first step they take to dance salsa.
ptwist said:base of the article and my dance with her..both are equally important and compliment eachother...most songs are the same in terms of how they are presented with the peaks...and drags of certain instruments but not all know the song from the beginning to the end to know how to compliment it with the move.....
we can't all be alex lima in one night![]()
UnlikelySalsero said:That's the point of this thread... Most guys don't know, especially the newer people. It's not easy to teach, because unless someone has a grounding in the music, it's not something you get in one hour or a few weeks. And we all start with a different set of ears, so just because you hear the clave, piano, bongos or mambo bell, doesn't mean I'm hearing it.
Then if you are hearing everything (few are), then you have to have the movement skills to create a visual which matches the instruments. It's a multi-layered process, and I totally agree, most new guys won't know about it.
UnlikelySalsero said:As I've said before, the vast majority of guys take a few months worth of club classes, then they pick-up the rest of their moves from watching others. If a club instructor invested 30 minutes in explaining music, 80% of the people wouldn't return the next week. If they don't return, you can't teach them about ANYTHING; no moves, no music, or how it all fits together.
Offbeat said:I agree and understand what you are saying. Right now I am going through the equivalent of beginner's hell in terms of getting my ear to hear the music. It as torturous or more as was taking the first basic steps.
sweavo said:Offbeat said:I agree and understand what you are saying. Right now I am going through the equivalent of beginner's hell in terms of getting my ear to hear the music. It as torturous or more as was taking the first basic steps.
plug! Link removed by Moderator
sweavo said:Offbeat said:I agree and understand what you are saying. Right now I am going through the equivalent of beginner's hell in terms of getting my ear to hear the music. It as torturous or more as was taking the first basic steps.
plug! Link removed by Moderator
sweavo said:Offbeat said:I agree and understand what you are saying. Right now I am going through the equivalent of beginner's hell in terms of getting my ear to hear the music. It as torturous or more as was taking the first basic steps.
plug! Link removed by Moderator
Offbeat said:<snip>
I wasn't referring to club classes. I believe club classes only serve to get people interested in salsa but not in teaching them how to dance. It is not possible to do justice to salsa dancing in one hour club class once a week. I was talking about workshop style or progressive series classes that more serious minded beginners start taking once they get caught by the salsa bug.
Offbeat said:How is it that in other dance forms both instructors and students are willing to learn about musical aspect of the dancing. Every AT instructor also told me that it takes an average lead at least a year's worth of practice or more before they can go out dancing at Milongas !
UnlikelySalsero said:In the bootcamps Edie dedicates a hour or more discussing the music. And her bootcamps in the fall are now including a full day of musicality training.
SnowDancer said:UnlikelySalsero said:In the bootcamps Edie dedicates a hour or more discussing the music. And her bootcamps in the fall are now including a full day of musicality training.
That would be great. Are these bootcamps for intermediate dancers, then? Any in L.A.?
I've taken a couple 1.5-hour 'musicality' workshops now. They've been helpful, but I found that the 2nd, unsurprisingly, was pretty much the same as the first. It would be good to have something more intensive, perhaps including body isolation practice.
This would also be a good topic for a DVD, since it doesn't require a partner.
salcero2005 said:My thoughts: [/b]
"Executing it (i.e., musicality) beautifully without pain or aggravation is virtually impossible if you are not taught the proper methods and techniques." I've seen many dancers do it with no formal training.
"Musicality in Salsa is still in its infancy." I wish she would have elaborated because musicality existed way before Edie. Perhaps she is talking about its potential. If you look at the old footage of Palladium dancers you saw a lot of musical interpretation of the music. What about Cuba?
"Musicality brings us back to dancing and interpreting the song the way the artist originally intended it" Again this sounds like the pre-text for another marketing pitch. Dancers feel and interpret music differently when they go by their true feelings and not some contrived routine laid out in a commercial DVD or bootcamp. Do or did salsa artists make music for dancers to dance a certain way to their music? If the song is about a particular dance, that may be true but this is another case of over generalization and oversimplification.
"Because they have memorized all the songs, and know every hit and break in the music." This is not musicality; this is choreography, and this is an important point that Edie is missing. Timing and musicality are not mutually exclusive. The notion that you have to memorize a song is ridiculous. If you know the structure of music as many mamberos do, you will have a sense of the ebbs and flows in the music.