If show groups really pay to perform then 101 shows must be big income for the organizer?
They have to pay for their own accomodation and buy performer’s pass. I don’t know how much a performer’s pass costs. It is usually discounted to 50% of the full congress pass (in most USA congresses). That would probable mean $115ish?
101 performer -if average per performance is two people that would net the organizer 200x115=$23,000. Hmm that’s impressive for single day collection.
I don’t know how many performers were there over three days - Fri, Sat, Sun. But I will assume that with room sharing, the performers booked at least 100 rooms at the venue. Organizers don’t get cut of revenues from the hotel for room bookings. Instead if the booking reaches minimum number of rooms, the hotel doesn’t charge rent for the ballrooms and other spaces.
Advantage to organizer is performers will book early. So minimum number of rooms quota is met. Then hotel opens the next tier room quota. When non-performers see the number of rooms already booked, they see it as a signal that a lot of people are interested. It creates a fly-wheel effect.
Assuming total 2000 attendees who are not performers, paying average $100 (a really low average figure) each, that is 2000x100=200,000. The main expense for organizers is insurance, travel fees, and accommodation for the top “artists” + the same for all the DJs. Most of the festival staff is volunteers with some paying partially for the festival pass depending on the number of hours volunteered. I am guessing minimum take is $250K. Assuming all the expenses cost $50K to $75K (generous assumption), you can see how profitable it is.