Dancing On3

But if he is changing the beat willy-nilly without any regard to any rhythm or instrument, then I will definitely call him out on it.

If he danced willy-nilly, he wouldn't survive in the scene. And definitely not get as many good dances from good followers as he did :) As I said if you saw him dance, he was definitely above average leader.

Since you say his dancing is good and that he is popular, then his partners must be able to follow him well enough not to get confused. So he's probably following some standard convention of counting that everyone else subscribes to..

We are not talking about counting. More about which beat he would break on. That was his point of argument. You can argue that changing how he breaks changes the count. You can be in the rhythm while changing the count on which you are dancing (that is breaking or whatever else you want to call it). I see may latinos as well who are not consistent either but will have plenty of sabor and good rhythm when they dance.

I always say I dance to the music, but I know that internally I'm dancing to a beat and that beat corresponds to some number. As long as I transmit that information clearly to my partner, then we won't have any problems dancing together.

Dance to the music is not necessary same as dancing to the count. First what exactly is the definition of dancing to the count? If you take 5 steps (or weight transfers) instead of 6 steps in salsa QQS-QQS in a 8 beat structure -> are you dancing to the count or not ? :)
 
For "partner" dancing (my definition two + people are physically connected while moving to the music) , we need some "order/structure." Otherwise, it's just shine dancing with someone. People are going to naturally move to the music but that expression will be different for everyone. Even Jazz (which I liked to play much better d/t freedom of improvization) had some basic structure. We may stray at times from what we are trained/ ingrained but will fall "back to basics" here and there.
 
I did count both as a dancer and as a musician. I taught myself how to listen to the instruments. I'm still baffled as to why I still can't stay on reverse On2 for an entire song lol. I have an internal compass that directs me to go back on 2 and forward on 6 when connected with a partner.

Consequently, On3 is much easier for me to dance to.

I find it's a mix of my training and my flow/musicality which makes me flop to break back on6 here and there. Over time I fall back to break back on 2. I find the melody drives me to change to anything other than breaking on 2/6. On3 seems too slow for me. I feel the 2/ is a good enough pause before it feels like I'm antsy to move..
 
If you take 5 steps (or weight transfers) instead of 6 steps in salsa QQS-QQS in a 8 beat structure -> are you dancing to the count or not

If those 5 steps relate to something in the music, then I would consider it ok.

But then, if we are talking about changing the number of steps or taking artibrary break steps, then we are coming dangerously close to re-writing the dance.

To me, if you can identify a Salsa rhythm (clave, tumbao, bass, etc), then the count becomes less relevant, but underlying each rhythm, there is a count and that count has meaning.
 
On3 seems too slow for me

It just seems more natural to me because the more music I listen to, the more I feel like delaying my break steps. My On2 has evolved over time and I no longer dance the same way as I did when I first started learning. I am naturally coming to the conclusion that delayed stepping gives my dancing a more 'in the pocket' feeling.
 
If those 5 steps relate to something in the music, then I would consider it ok.

But then, if we are talking about changing the number of steps or taking artibrary break steps, then we are coming dangerously close to re-writing the dance.

To me, if you can identify a Salsa rhythm (clave, tumbao, bass, etc), then the count becomes less relevant, but underlying each rhythm, there is a count and that count has meaning.

You are talking about count from music perspective. My question is from dance perspective. What exactly would constitute dancing to the count. Or what would you consider as not dancing to the count?
 
You are talking about count from music perspective. My question is from dance perspective. What exactly would constitute dancing to the count. Or what would you consider as not dancing to the count?

Always dancing on the up beat (add confused and angry emoji here):mad::hungover:o_O
 
Always dancing on the up beat (add confused and angry emoji here):mad::hungover:o_O


I had read some report, don't remember where. Perhaps posted it on SF. It said Africans (don't know from which region there) clapped to the upbeat and the westerners clap to the down bear when listening to music. Don't think they were talking about the same music.
 
I am having a hard time visualizing an upbeat in Salsa. What would those be?

Unless you guys mean upbeats always being the '&'.

In musician terms, this would correspond to the portion of the beat with the foot being up.

1 & 2 & 3 & 4 &
 
I am having a hard time visualizing an upbeat in Salsa. What would those be?

Unless you guys mean upbeats always being the '&'.

In musician terms, this would correspond to the portion of the beat with the foot being up.

1 & 2 & 3 & 4 &
Yeah. 2 being an off beat confuses me. Off beats correspond to the up stroke on guitar (like ska). But then a again on 135or 7 is A tiempo and 246and is contra tiempo. Maybe a throwback to when Son was written in 2/4 timing? Its above my comprehension.
 
Contra (against the time)tiempo is on 2 4 6 8. A tiempo is with tome 1 3 5 7

I mean, I know what it means when they say a Jazz piece swings. In fact, swing, in Jazz actually refers to two things:

1) Swinging "Literary" - the attribute of playing the even eight notes closer/later to the odd eighth notes, or perhaps its better said, playing notes as if the beats are subdivided into triplets, such that the time signature is, in effect 3/4 or 6/8.

2) Swinging - Playing in a grooving, funky way in which the beat is both emphasized well and yet reflects the "humanism" of the artist playing. Accentuating and de-accentuating all the right beats for artistic effect.

So this is what it means in Jazz, and, if by "swing" we mean the second definition when we refer to it in Salsa, then , cool.

But I get the impression that when Salsa people talk about swing, some of us really mean 'Swing", like that 3/4 time thing! Back in '98 when I didn't know anything about Salsa, I walked into this instrument shop and the saleperson fellow hunched over the congas said to me "you know what's the problem with Salsa nowadays? It doesn't really swing."

So, what might we mean?

Possibility 1: Emphasizing the Clave: Salsa swings when the instruments honor the clave in their own respective ways

Possibility 2: The Upbeats: Salsa swings when it emphasizes back-beats - the 2, 4, 6, 8 by the dancers' count.

Possibility 3: Literal Tertiary Swing/Shuffle: Salsa swings when some instruments actually literally swings (shuffles, I would call it if you are talking about a 16th note pulse)

Possibility 4: Something I am completely missing

To complicate matters, Calichris, in the Cha-Cha vs. Son thread, quoted Willie Colon in the following way:




Hmmm, this 6/8 piece has me open. When I was first analyzing and trying to figure out the Salsa groove back in 2010, I had (and for a long time, had) the sneaking suspicioun that Salsa had some kind of tertiary shuffle in it somewhere; a 6/8 beat by its very nature shuffles. However, I have been unable to detect an instrument that, as part of its typical contribution to the groove, shuffles. Now, there are exceptions galore to this. I will sometimes program by congas or bongos to play a shuffling or (literally) swinging fill-in here and there. Furthermore, some arrangers (Grupo Niche) is a fine example, will arrange shuffling horn parts (Cali Pachanguero has a few shuffling horn bops).

So, can we can come to some kind of consensus as to what we mean by Salsa swinging? I know the Jazz cats will never agree to this (one Jazz musician, when challenged to define swing, remarked "man, you're better off trying to figure out Einstein's theory"). But I'd like to think that us Salsa cats are more in one accord than the Jazz cats :)


See bolded. Also I remember some youtube videos and other websites which said 2,4,6,8 in Salsa are upbeats and the "&" are the half beat are syncopations. Confused a hell out of me since the western music/pop theory suggests the & were the upbeats.

That's why I prefer when talking about dancer's beats (for dancing), we don't confuse it with musicians counts or beats. I never learned music and don't play any instruments. Most musicians are not good at the dancing part to the music and musicality.

To me it doesn't really matter what whether you call them up or down beat. To me whether it is a full, half or quarter notes/beat is all I care. The half and quarter notes means syncopated steps (usually).


Good post and thread overall on this topic with a few resources to read up on:

It would be if you could hear the pulse. In pop music the pulse is often explicit, by marking with the kick-drum. e.g. Aqua.

However, in poly-rhythmic music both the beat and the pulse are often implied.
http://www.unlikelysalsero.com/2012/10/musical-pulse-explicit-and-implicit.html


Afro-Cuban music is syncopated and so many of the notes you hear are not on the beat but half-way between beats. If you're used to Jazz, Swing, Ragtime etc then you may be familiar with one form of syncopation already.

How Music Works 2 - Rhythm - Part 3


Salsa uses cross-rhythms by super-imposing many rhythms on-top of each other. No one instrument can give you the down-beat or up-beat, you have to feel the implied beat by making sense of all the various rhythms being played at the same time. Which is why it's quite hard for western ears that are not used to African cross-rhythms/poly-rhythm.

Take a very simplified example...

http://salsa-merengue.co.uk/VidTutor/salsatwo/piano/core_montuno_guajeo.html

Play the sample in the above link with Piano montuno, Conga and 2-3 Son Clave.
See figure 8.9, which shows the count/beat and pulse vs the conga and montuno rhythms.

You will notice that on beats 3, 5 and 7.. the down-beat is marked by the *absence* of a note being played. Which is the African way of doing things.

How Music Works 2 - Rhythm - Part 4


The above video explains how Cuban push rhythm works in Cuban Son music, which is the basis for Salsa rhythms.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top