Depends on where you live. In many European cities Cuban style (which arrived before linear styles) is still going strong. Glasgow for example is a 90% Cuban style scene.They say that if you don't do use it, then you lose it. Most places dance On1 or On2, so there is little chance of using what you learned in Cuba and Cali.
For people that live outside of Cuba and Cali, what is the practicality of going there and learning Salsa?
so there is little chance of using what you learned in Cuba and Cali.
What is referred to as "Cuban style"/"Cuban Salsa" is "el baile de Casino" which is nothing more than Son danced in the style of the casinos, " (the same way Son is traditionally danced)
.
I gave a Son class on "2" this past week, to on "1" style dancers, with traditional style music, and some, more modern .
They were surprised how easy the transition was, and, they pretty much stayed on "2" .
What surprised me more.. they luvvved the music .
Btw I'm certainly not disputing the value of learning son, although personally I would suggest learning salsa, mambo and rumba in Puerto Rico would be more valuable.
Btw I'm certainly not disputing the value of learning son, although personally I would suggest learning salsa, mambo and rumba in Puerto Rico would be more valuable.
I have observed that in Cuban style there are three main timings 123, 1-34 and 234.
When I take a look at the break timing, some 123 dancers break consistently on1, others consistently on2 and a good bunch of dancers vary between 1 and 2. Most 1-34 dancers often break on3, but their break timings vary as well.
.
Have you been to Puerto Rico, Cuba, or Colombia? I've only been to Cuba so I don't really know what might be the value of the other places. The suggestion of going to Puerto Rico to learn rumba does surprise me. Of course there are good rumberos in many places (including New York) but I would think that Cuba would be ground zero for learning la rumba cubana.
I don't know a whole lot about the development of the dance when it arrived in the US, but from what I've heard it was quickly mixed with Latin Hustle and I suspect that has a lot to do with the differences in the movement, body motion and the aesthetic of in-line dance styles versus casino and son. And at this point in my salsa dancing career I think it's fruitless to try to say one style is superior to another. We all have our personal preferences which I think have more to do with our personalities than with any objective qualities of the music and dances. The most balanced people probably enjoy a little of everythingSurely if it sounds different to son recorded in Cuba, it needs a new name? Son de los unidos or son americano are not exactly catchy, just like calling timba salsa cubana would not work. My problem with saying 'salsa is just son' is that it denies the essential audible differences between the 2 genres, or implies the only differences are that salsa is an inferior copy of something from another culture. The NY residents who created salsa (some of whom were, of course, Cuban) took son and mambo but they created a new genre. There are plenty examples of classic salsa that are actually from the 50s or 60s, and there are plenty examples of classic salsa that are not from NY. Yet how many of those tunes are recorded in Cuba? Very few, if any.
To clarify: I am in no doubt that this new genre of salsa was clearly based on son: the son clave and playing en clave, the rhythmic patterns such as tumbao, and the song structure were all created in Cuba. But salsa sounds different to son, and not in the way UB40 sound different to a Jamaican reggae band.
Et2 is not basically the same as son, however et2 comes from contratiempo, which is a Cuban import. But most of the variations in mambo dancing were created in the US. Musically US mambo is a descendant of a Cuban form, indeed one of the big 3 of mambo was Machito, a Cuban immigrant. Likewise Cachao was another massive influence on mambo music, as were other Cubans (particularly the top Cuban congueros, 6 out of 7 of whom ended up in the US).
Again the Cuban roots are essential, but so is the development in the US, and the US developments go way beyond turning a circle into a line.
Good for you; so am I, so do I, and my casino is crappier than yours.
I believe that unintentionally your statements betray a view that casino is superior to slot styles. (Casino is superior to slot styles for dancing to timba imo, and maybe some hardcore salsa and mambo fans also regard casino as superior for those genres.) But please, don't ignore the role of the US and PR in salsa and mambo dance forms.
I don't know a whole lot about the development of the dance when it arrived in the US, but from what I've heard it was quickly mixed with Latin Hustle danced
OK. It was people from NY who have told me that.Latin Hustle ( which I taught for many yrs ) arrived on the scene after , Salsa was already developed . Salsas evolution continued ,as LH died out .
And LH is more based on WCS, where as salsa took on board, many of the Mambo/Lindy/Bolero/ ECS, variations( with a couple of exceptions ) .
/OK. It was people from NY who have told me that.
So one question I have then is why did US styles become so linear when son and mambo are not? I mean they include a linear step but it is not the most common basic step.