Attn: Myst, DJ Yuca, Two Centes Tipper, Tall Paul, etc

Richie Blondet

Son Montuno
I read with great interest some of the responses and exchanges in the Cuban Salsa - You Like It? thread. Sadly, it got locked before I had an opportunity to partake in the conversation.

Moderators, if renewing this topic is out of order, just delete it. I'm hoping that the reasons the original thread got locked won't surface on this new thread. I simply found some of the commentary interesting and wanted to add to the discussion. In particular, respond to Myst, as well as some of the others.

Myst wrote:
I am afraid you have it backwards. Mambo is a sub-genre of Son Cubano derived from the Montuno Section which Arsenio first called "Diablo" then "Mambo." Cachao was the first one to make a whole song out in of this Mambo section in 1938 - giving birth to Mambo as a stand-alone genre derived from Son. This was later popularized by Perez Prado in Mexico, and several musicians such as Arsenio, Tito Puente, and Cachao in the USA. In Cuba Mambo had limited success.

What you described Cachao as doing isn't altogether accurate. If you're referring to the Danzon composition "Mambo," then that credit goes to his brother "Macho" [Orestes Lopez] who wrote the tune. Also, an entire song was not established using this form inspired by Arsenio. The piece is a Danzon. Which included the 'Mambo' section that is typical of all Danzones. The "Afro" part of the song structure. While the song title escapes me for the moment, it was the pianist Bebo Valdes who actually launched the first Danzon-Mambo before the Lopez Brothers did so with Arcano y sus Maravillas. I know that the books state otherwise and all of the scholars and historians have cited Cachao. But we have the luxury of retrospect by way of the discographies and via the oral history provided by Bebo prior to his passing. Orestes Lopez' claim to fame is really that he is the fist to use the term "Mambo" in a composition.

I would also venture to say that, based solely upon the music itself, it is also debatable that "Mambo" as a genre starts with Perez Prado. I know you didn't express this in your post, but I just wanted to clarify it in case anyone interpreted it that way. I totally agree with you that 'Mambo' as a musical genre or a dance, had no viable audience in Cuba. In fact, the several musicians who were dabbling and experimenting with it, were rejected. [Including Prado who was wallowing away at the Casino De La Playa and later made his way to NYC and then onto Mexico.] A 1967 interview with Arsenio Rodriguez describes him expressing how the public in Cuba reacted to both his innovations [such as expanding the sexteto-septeto (traditional conjuntos of the period), adding the tumbadora drum and piano, with multiple brass], but his brand of music as well. They made fun of him and called him crazy. If anything, Arsenio should be credited with what you cited "Cachao" as having done. Creating entire songs derived from his own concept [Diablo/Mambo]. An example of this would be his composition: "Baila Simon."

That Perez Prado popularized "Mambo," the term, is certainly a fact. Musically speaking, there is still a technicality or more that may put a hole in giving Prado the ultimate credit. Again, going back to the overall discography of Cuba and New York specifically, we have bands who are interpreting what one could regard as proto-mambos from 1944-1946. Before Prado launches his orchestra and scores his Mambo success in 1947 in Mexico City, USA and beyond. You had musicians in Cuba such as Rene Hernandez, Julio Cuevas and Bebo Valdes, who were experimenting and recording such proto-Mambos. One of the closest sounds to what became the NY Mambo style of the 1950s, could be heard in the recordings by Jose Curbelo and his Orchestra, circa 1946-'47. It isn't coincidence that Tito Puente is the arranger on several of Curbelo's songs. Only the media in the USA referred to Curbelo's music as RHUMBA and not "Mambo." The 'Rhumba or Rumba [not to be confused with the folkloric version] being a similar catch all term in the 1930s-1940s, as "Salsa" became in the 1960s to the present day. I would also cite Pupi Campo's Orchestra, which, in the late 1940s, also featured Puente, not only as a member, but as its musical director. Prado's orchestral sound was certainly distinct, but the concept he was following wasn't radical by any means as there are strains of it all throughout the decade of the 1940s in Cuba, Puerto Rico, the United States and, of course, Mexico.

It's kind of like Timba and Songo. While they both have their distinct characteristics, one could *argue* that those early Timba bands like NG La Banda or Manolin, Paulito, etc were also interpreting a kind of Songo-plus. And on the reverse end, Los Van Van were producing what one could argue were proto-Timbas. The labeling or tags we use to identify and associate a sound or band has a tendency to marginalize music in a way where there are no real parameters. Save for the ones we create.

I also want to stress that neither Arsenio and, especially, "Cachao," did not popularize 'Mambo' in the United States. Arsenio's musical style and approach was never embraced in NYC and had more of an impact on local musicians, both in the Caribbean, South & North America, than on the public who resided in all of those locations. "Cachao" does not become a full time orchestra leader until the 1990s, when Andy Garcia re-introduces him to the public via a documentary and several CD productions. Prior to this he had been a sideman, leading informal sessions, both live and recorded. When he relocated to NYC, he is a sideman and occasionally works at a place called the Liborio cabaret in midtown Manhattan leading a trio. [There are flyers to support this]. Occasionally, Candido Camero would sit in as a guest.

The band leaders who popularized "Mambo" in both a generic form [anyone known to interpret Cuban oriented music was automatically doing Mambo. The term itself also transformed into a catch all phrase] and an actual musical style associated with the U.S., early on, were the Big Three, and people like Prado, Cugat [inadvertently], Joe Loco, Alfredito [Levy], Noro Morales, Miguelito Valdes, Alberto Iznaga, La Playa Sextet, Jose Curbelo, Cal Tjader, Cesar Concepcion, Anselmo Sacassas, Luis Varona, Rene Bloch, and Pete Terrace.

Furthermore, Son is the tree from which most Cuban dance music emerge, such as:
Son Montuno, Mambo, Guaracha, Cha cha cha, Charanga, Timba, etc , AND Salsa ( which isn't a musical term but a commercial label given to all the rhythms aforementioned...)

Yes... but it also has its other significances. Based on people's perceptions. It's a marketing term, but it doesn't become such a thing lest it was already in use by the people. That term had been floating around for some time prior to record companies gaining hold of it. And was being used in the context it is used today. But "Salsa" is also perceived as a musical genre. There is or was a category in the U.S. Grammy Award division. Retail stores stocked or stock music product under that name. Musicians and their band leaders have adopted the term and identify it almost as if it were a musical genre. Again, I agree, it's just a name. But we also have to consider the realities of how that term is perceived by a large segment of society. The same way that Timba or Charanga are just words and not actual rhythmical forms. Nevertheless, they are perceived to be styles and even genres unto themselves [though they are not].

At one point in time, it could be argued that "Salsa" was a specific format. The overblown conjuntos of multiple trumpets and, especially, multiple trombones, begins in the NYC scene. It had its unique characteristics the way Charanga or Timba or Big Band Mambo has its specific characteristics that make them stand out. But as the years have gone by, the argument of it being a format, I would say, no longer holds water.

This is it for now, but I noticed some other posts I wanted to reply to and when I have an opportunity will attempt to do so on this thread...

Richie
 
Last edited:
I don't have enough knowledge about the historical facts, but based on musical analysis I completely agree with you, Richie.
Rhythm is not the only aspect that categorizes a style, there is a lot more like harmonies, instrumentation etc.
And I think one can focus on whatever he wants to support his own ideas - which is what we probalbly all do, because we're human. :-)

In my opinion, Mambo is already very influenced by US bigband arrangement, whoever created it. So for me it is already a mixture of influences and therefore belongs to nobody - but IS a style.

Same for Salsa, which for me is a clearly defined style. I hear the pop influence in it, and I hear all of Latin America in it, too, not only Cuba.

99% of the rhythmical structures are cuban, yes. But when we look at the harmonies and the musical style things are no so clear anymore.

This discussion has happened a lot in jazz, too...
If it's african mostly or not, etc.
In the end, styles that emerge from mixture of cultures are just themselves, and it's us who afterwards want to attribute it or take it away from somebody.

I'm happy music itself has no passport nor political ambitions, and I love it for this. It's us who after discuss about these things - while music keeps evolving, not caring about us.
 
In my opinion, Mambo is already very influenced by US bigband arrangement, whoever created it. So for me it is already a mixture of influences and therefore belongs to nobody - but IS a style. Same for Salsa, which for me is a clearly defined style. I hear the pop influence in it, and I hear all of Latin America in it, too, not only Cuba.
99% of the rhythmical structures are cuban, yes. But when we look at the harmonies and the musical style things are no so clear anymore.

You make a valid point. And I am in complete agreement with the concept of abolishing ownership. The reason being is because if that were enforced or supported, a lot of great music would not have been produced. Perez Prado while he was drawing from Cuban influences was also frawing from North American, in the form of Stan Kenton. On the flip side, Kenton himself says he was influenced by Noro Morales and was impacted by Machito's Orchestra. And those bands who influenced and impacted have their role models, etc.

With that said, the one constant is that they all adopted Cuban musical forms and interpreted and or experimented with them in their own way. Therefore, making them Cuban+. Be it Afro Cuban-Jazz, New York, Puerto Rican or Mexico-based Afro Cuban dance music, etc. Even then, it ultimately boils down to the sounds of individual artists and their signature renditions. The "Salsa" of Willie Colon does not 'sound' like Richie Ray's. Nor does any of their music sound like Eddie Palmieri's. Like in BeBop, you hear distinct styles ranging from Monk to Dizzy to Bud Powell to Miles. Yet, they're all categorized under the same banner.

I don't think Myst was giving the music a Cuban I.D. in the sense of ownership, but rather to identify it properly. By and large, regardless of the outside influences or elements we can hear, the foundations of the music is the rhythm. The melodies and harmonics are built upon them. Throughout history, "Salsa" has been primarily Afro Cuban in nature and any outside elements are built upon that foundation. Today, I would say it is completely Afro Cuban 100%. The bands who are actively recording or playing today do not insert Brasilian or Puerto Rican elements into the music anymore. It's pretty much teh blueprint of Cuban Popular Music. Mambo, Guaracha, Son Montuno, Guajira and Guaguanco. Boleros have gone the way of the dodo bird. And the ensembles who do play bomba or plena and other musics almost always stick to those styles exclusively. Thereby, becoming categorized as something other than "Salsa."

Bottomline is that Afro Cuban music has many an ethnic face. Large or small, I'd be hard pressed to think that someone like the African-American timbalero Pucho Brown wouldn't consider what he plays as 'his' music, as much as any Cuban or Puerto Rican, etc. Or like Larry Harlow who just celebrated his 40th year in the Santero religion. Or a David Frankel [AVENIDA B fame] from the Lower East Side who loves this music MORE than any typical Cuban from Miami. How about El Caobo? You? Me? Tptgroove? Etc?

It's OUR music. That just so happens to be grounded in Afro Cuban popular music and folkloric tradition.

In the end, styles that emerge from mixture of cultures are just themselves, and it's us who afterwards want to attribute it or take it away from somebody.

In a word... Nationalism.

I'm happy music itself has no passport nor political ambitions, and I love it for this. It's us who after discuss about these things - while music keeps evolving, not caring about us.

I think once you get a serious grasp of the music itself and go back to the beginning and can see the process of evolution, that is where one's ethnic pride and all the other "buttons" that push people into turning discussions liek this into a free for all, tend to fade away. Becasue you'll know the truth and can accept it on your own terms. Most people don't dig being told something is not what you believe it to be. It usually has to come down to self realization. A lot of my Puerto Ricans brothers and sisters get 'snarky' with me when I identify SALSA as Afro Cuban dance music. They separate music be geography or ethnicity. Son is Son. From Cuba. But Salsa is Salsa. From New York. Then there's Colombian Salsa. Venezuelan Salsa. Salsa from Puerto Rico. Dominican Salsa.

They're all playing the same rhythms by and large and the rest is their own signature way of interpreting it. Nevertheless, its the same kind of music. Just played or that sounds differently. Once we take the cultural blinders off, we can look at each other and the music as being representative of a global community. That is not to say we forget the traditions or the roots and don't acknowledge them. But that we realize that the story of this music cannot be discussed solely from the perspective of what was happening in Cuba or New York, but everyplace else, featuring people who are or are from places like Panama, West Indies, African-Americans, Dominican Republic, Jewish Americans, Spain, Colombia, as much as Cubans and Puerto Ricans.
 
To make it even more complicated, I realized that very often a musical style that is created by fusion of different ethnical folklores has many element that can be from both.
Actually, sometimes I think a fusion starts - or even happens only - with elements that are somehow familiar to both.
Examples: clave in flamenco styles, clave in afrocuban music.
Pentatonic scales on way or the other
Polyrhythmic - polyphony.

So in the end, many of the new styles even invite to think "that is from my country!" - and it's there in noth cultures.
As on top of that, things happen simultaneously, guided by the energy of a historic time AND very often
 
Oops - hadn't finished:

..And very often all of the elements are not well documented.
Who knows what exact elements in the Cabildos are from what tribe?
Who knows what the Spanish gipsies were playing secretly?
Who knows which elements are phoenician, or ancient greek?
Where in their migration the gipsies adopted what?
What influenced Spanish folklore by afrocuban one or the other way round?

That makes these discussions get close to beliefs, following our logic - which is always influenced by what we want or have already decided.
 
So very often, probably in the end we're all right - and wrong.
It's still interesting to read everybodies oppinion and knowledge.
But we should not become upset - if possible.
Usually nobody will convince nobody about anything on an internet forum,.
 
Yeah, I was thinking of this subject the other night when I was watching a film about the Belfast Punk scene in the 70s*. Here in Northern Ireland, we occasionally like to claim that Belfast was the real spiritual home of punk music. ("New York had the haircuts. London had the trousers. Belfast had the reason!")

Claiming "we practically invented it" is the cheeky kind of hubris you expect from bands who are excited about the music they're making. It's not plagiarism. Everyone knows that music and musical forms transcend national boundaries. (And in the case of Salsa, everyone knows that Salsa is Afro-Cuban, and hardly anyone knows about the Nuyorican contribution to the music).

However, playing songs that were written by other people and making money out of them, without paying appropriate royalties to the writers is certainly plagiarism, I would agree with that.

(* "Good Vibrations" - very entertaining film, go and see it. My best mate's charity shop provided most of the vinyl used in the film, as his girlfriend was the prop buyer).
 
Yeah, I was thinking of this subject the other night when I was watching a film about the Belfast Punk scene in the 70s*. Here in Northern Ireland, we occasionally like to claim that Belfast was the real spiritual home of punk music. ("New York had the haircuts. London had the trousers. Belfast had the reason!")

Claiming "we practically invented it" is the cheeky kind of hubris you expect from bands who are excited about the music they're making. It's not plagiarism. Everyone knows that music and musical forms transcend national boundaries. (And in the case of Salsa, everyone knows that Salsa is Afro-Cuban, and hardly anyone knows about the Nuyorican contribution to the music).

However, playing songs that were written by other people and making money out of them, without paying appropriate royalties to the writers is certainly plagiarism, I would agree with that.

(* "Good Vibrations" - very entertaining film, go and see it. My best mate's charity shop provided most of the vinyl used in the film, as his girlfriend was the prop buyer).
I never heard of that before, but I've been there a couple of times, and punk would suit Belfast very well! :)
I love that city, my sister lived there for some years.

About the plagiarism - well yes, the political reality behind that whole Salsa-dispute is tragical, and I do understand hard emotions.
I've lived similar situations in discussions about blues/rock'n roll, flamenco/spanish folklore, or gipsy flamenco/non-gipsy flamenco, cool jazz/hardbop, etc, etc, etc.

Unfortunately, music evolution doesn't care about justice behind it.
The historical facts that led to Jazz or the mixture of cultures that evolved in Afrocuban music were terrible.
The mixture of history, personal history and music origins is just explosive.
I do understand that. We should just all be aware of it when discussing, at least.
 
the Mambo appeared in the late 1930s and althought Perez Prado was not the creator, with out a doubt he was the one who popularized the mambo worldwide.... in the late 1940s he popularized the mambo in Mexico, in the late 40s and early 50s he toured and popularized the mambo in Latin America, Spain, Japan, and the U.S..... he made a mambo with a Japanese melody and said in an interview that people loved that mambo in Japan during his tour

in the late 40s and 50s Prado lived between La Havana and Mexico City.... in the 1940s the mambo that developed in cuba was more danceable than Perez Prado's mambo, Prado's mambo was faster

best regards all

1. Perez Prado - Que Rico Mambo
2. is the title of this song "Quien invento el mambo" from a movie in Mexico, i like the cuban dancer Amalia Aguilar

Donde Estabas Tu, this song from the 1940s is one of my favorites

3. Conjunto Casino
4. Nelo Sosa y su Conjunto
5. Benny More y su Banda Gigante





 
Last edited:
Prado is indeed my favorite Mambero.

That may sound weird to all the die-hard Puente fans. I actually love Tito Puente....but his sound is so proto-Salsa...I mean it sounds more Salsa than all other Salsa. I know musicologically this is wrong, that most Salsa sounds like his Mambo, but its the way I feel.

When I want to hear funky Mambo (which is also linearly simple and danceable) that doesn't sound like Salsa, I put on Perez (its great cooking music).
 
I also associate Mambo usually first with Perez Prado, but I only have my knowledge from what I learned...
My favorites are Tata Güines with Machito, though. Although I also like Perez Prado or Yma Sumac - also for cooking or cleaning! :)
 
By the way, I've read about Cachao's importance in Mambo, but for some reason, I don't know recordings or videos of this, can somebody help?
 
Moderators, if renewing this topic is out of order, just delete it. I'm hoping that the reasons the original thread got locked won't surface on this new thread. I simply found some of the commentary interesting and wanted to add to the discussion.
No problem whatsoever with people discussing the history of music as long as everyone stays calm and nobody starts behaving aggressively, throwing personal attacks and insults, etc. If that happens, this thread will also be closed.

SalsaForums Staff
 
I read with great interest some of the responses and exchanges in the Cuban Salsa - You Like It? thread. Sadly, it got locked before I had an opportunity to partake in the conversation.

Moderators, if renewing this topic is out of order, just delete it. I'm hoping that the reasons the original thread got locked won't surface on this new thread. I simply found some of the commentary interesting and wanted to add to the discussion. In particular, respond to Myst, as well as some of the others.

Myst wrote:

What you described Cachao as doing isn't altogether accurate. If you're referring to the Danzon composition "Mambo," then that credit goes to his brother "Macho" [Orestes Lopez] who wrote the tune. Also, an entire song was not established using this form inspired by Arsenio. The piece is a Danzon. Which included the 'Mambo' section that is typical of all Danzones. The "Afro" part of the song structure. While the song title escapes me for the moment, it was the pianist Bebo Valdes who actually launched the first Danzon-Mambo before the Lopez Brothers did so with Arcano y sus Maravillas. I know that the books state otherwise and all of the scholars and historians have cited Cachao. But we have the luxury of retrospect by way of the discographies and via the oral history provided by Bebo prior to his passing. Orestes Lopez' claim to fame is really that he is the fist to use the term "Mambo" in a composition.

I would also venture to say that, based solely upon the music itself, it is also debatable that "Mambo" as a genre starts with Perez Prado. I know you didn't express this in your post, but I just wanted to clarify it in case anyone interpreted it that way. I totally agree with you that 'Mambo' as a musical genre or a dance, had no viable audience in Cuba. In fact, the several musicians who were dabbling and experimenting with it, were rejected. [Including Prado who was wallowing away at the Casino De La Playa and later made his way to NYC and then onto Mexico.] A 1967 interview with Arsenio Rodriguez describes him expressing how the public in Cuba reacted to both his innovations [such as expanding the sexteto-septeto (traditional conjuntos of the period), adding the tumbadora drum and piano, with multiple brass], but his brand of music as well. They made fun of him and called him crazy. If anything, Arsenio should be credited with what you cited "Cachao" as having done. Creating entire songs derived from his own concept [Diablo/Mambo]. An example of this would be his composition: "Baila Simon."

That Perez Prado popularized "Mambo," the term, is certainly a fact. Musically speaking, there is still a technicality or more that may put a hole in giving Prado the ultimate credit. Again, going back to the overall discography of Cuba and New York specifically, we have bands who are interpreting what one could regard as proto-mambos from 1944-1946. Before Prado launches his orchestra and scores his Mambo success in 1947 in Mexico City, USA and beyond. You had musicians in Cuba such as Rene Hernandez, Julio Cuevas and Bebo Valdes, who were experimenting and recording such proto-Mambos. One of the closest sounds to what became the NY Mambo style of the 1950s, could be heard in the recordings by Jose Curbelo and his Orchestra, circa 1946-'47. It isn't coincidence that Tito Puente is the arranger on several of Curbelo's songs. Only the media in the USA referred to Curbelo's music as RHUMBA and not "Mambo." The 'Rhumba or Rumba [not to be confused with the folkloric version] being a similar catch all term in the 1930s-1940s, as "Salsa" became in the 1960s to the present day. I would also cite Pupi Campo's Orchestra, which, in the late 1940s, also featured Puente, not only as a member, but as its musical director. Prado's orchestral sound was certainly distinct, but the concept he was following wasn't radical by any means as there are strains of it all throughout the decade of the 1940s in Cuba, Puerto Rico, the United States and, of course, Mexico.

It's kind of like Timba and Songo. While they both have their distinct characteristics, one could *argue* that those early Timba bands like NG La Banda or Manolin, Paulito, etc were also interpreting a kind of Songo-plus. And on the reverse end, Los Van Van were producing what one could argue were proto-Timbas. The labeling or tags we use to identify and associate a sound or band has a tendency to marginalize music in a way where there are no real parameters. Save for the ones we create.

I also want to stress that neither Arsenio and, especially, "Cachao," did not popularize 'Mambo' in the United States. Arsenio's musical style and approach was never embraced in NYC and had more of an impact on local musicians, both in the Caribbean, South & North America, than on the public who resided in all of those locations. "Cachao" does not become a full time orchestra leader until the 1990s, when Andy Garcia re-introduces him to the public via a documentary and several CD productions. Prior to this he had been a sideman, leading informal sessions, both live and recorded. When he relocated to NYC, he is a sideman and occasionally works at a place called the Liborio cabaret in midtown Manhattan leading a trio. [There are flyers to support this]. Occasionally, Candido Camero would sit in as a guest.

The band leaders who popularized "Mambo" in both a generic form [anyone known to interpret Cuban oriented music was automatically doing Mambo. The term itself also transformed into a catch all phrase] and an actual musical style associated with the U.S., early on, were the Big Three, and people like Prado, Cugat [inadvertently], Joe Loco, Alfredito [Levy], Noro Morales, Miguelito Valdes, Alberto Iznaga, La Playa Sextet, Jose Curbelo, Cal Tjader, Cesar Concepcion, Anselmo Sacassas, Luis Varona, Rene Bloch, and Pete Terrace.

Richie

Hi Richie,

You response regarding the genesis of Mambo is certainly more comprehensive that what I originally posted. Please keep in mind my original post was in reply to Yuca claiming that Son was derived from Mambo - when in fact Mambo falls within the Son Generic Complex. I did not intend to offer an exhaustive history of the origin of Mambo on that reply, but just to clarify where mambo fell in respect to Son, and also the relationship of the musical term to the dance term.

I agree with your historical account. My understanding is that the "Mambo" tune written in 1938 is credited to both brothers, and Cachao being more prominent , usually gets mentioned more often. Perez Prado certainly did not invent Mambo music. He did however introduced the Mambo dance (a mix of Son Urbano with Rumba elements and Cabaret style moves - in other words - a stage dance), and became the most prominent Cuban Mambo musician, establishing his career primarily in Mexico.

Regarding the Salsa label, let's explore in another reply its musical and historical validity, as well as its ethical ramifications.
 
Last edited:
Prado is indeed my favorite Mambero.

I actually love Tito Puente....but his sound is so proto-Salsa...I mean it sounds more Salsa than all other Salsa. I know musicologically this is wrong, that most Salsa sounds like his Mambo, but its the way I feel.

There's no such thing as "Proto-Salsa". The reason that Tito Puente sounds like "Salsa" to you is not because his music is a precursor to Salsa, it is because Salsa took the music of Tito Puente, Sonora Matancera, Conjunto Casino, Arsenio Rodriguez, Cachao, etc. and lumped it all together under the umbrella name of Salsa.

This is the sort of misconception that such label brings about, and it's time that people who seek a deeper knowledge, respect, and appreciation for this music dispel it - which I would think constitutes the membership in this forum. What we do have is the following:

Son Music Complex made up of rhythms such as: Son, Son Montuno, Guajira, Guajira- Son, Mambo, Afro Cuban Jazz, Bolero, Bolero-Son, Guaracha, Cha Cha Cha, Pregon, Son Guaguanco, etc.​

What you call Salsa musically speaking is nothing but one of those rhythms. In fact, you can take any "Salsa" song and identify it as primarily a Guaracha, Son Montuno, Cha Cha, etc (very little actual Mambo is present in Salsa).

May be we should create a new thread:

Name the Rhythms in that "Salsa" song...

Where people post songs and we can all identify what rhythms are actually being used.

As a side note, this Sunday at the NYC Salsa Congress Ismael Miranda had a kick-ass concert. Not only is he a great singer, but a man of integrity, he said this out loud to the crowd that night:

"I learned from ... Benny More. Back then we played Guajira, Mambo, Cha Cha, but today people have gotten lazy and call it all "Salsa".

I hope the concert gets posted on Youtube. He shared many other interesting insights and anecdotes with the public.​
 
Last edited:
Please keep in mind my original post was in reply to Yuca claiming that Son was derived from Mambo

That wasn't what I wrote. I stated that son was one of the subgenres of mambo - which is true, however I should have made it clear (as I later did) that son is primarily its own form of music, that predates mambo.
 
That wasn't what I wrote. I stated that son was one of the subgenres of mambo - which is true, however I should have made it clear (as I later did) that son is primarily its own form of music, that predates mambo.
Claiming that Son is a subgenre of Mambo is the same as claiming Son is derived from Mambo...by definition the prefix sub means it is a derivation

And yes, later on you corrected that statement. I was just putting my original comment in context.
 
"I learned from ... Benny More. Back then we played Guajira, Mambo, Cha Cha, but today people have gotten lazy and call it all "Salsa".
My understanding is that "back then" people were also lazy and called it all "Mambo". Before that they were lazy and called it all "Rhumba".

The musicians would have known the difference, and I dare say they still do today - the writers and arrangers especially. (I wonder how aware dancers were of the distinctions between sub-genres back in the Mambo era?...)

But I do support making people more aware of such distinctions.
(See the following discussion threads:
http://www.salsaforums.com/threads/...uajira-vs-boogaloo-musical-differences.23192/
http://www.salsaforums.com/threads/what-distinguishes-ny-guaguanco.20225/
http://www.salsaforums.com/threads/guaracha-definition.24434/)

In practice, it can often be pretty difficult to distinguish between the sub-genres. It's easy to rhyme off the names of sub-genres, it's harder to say with confidence "that's a guaracha" or "that's a mambo". Not impossible though...

That wasn't what I wrote. I stated that son was one of the subgenres of mambo - which is true...
IMO, I'd say that that's only true insofar as "Mambo" was used as a catch-all marketing term for Afro-Cuban music, in the same way as "Salsa" was used from the 70s onwards.

Most of the sub-genres included under the "Mambo" marketing umbrella (Son Montuno, Guaracha, Guaganco de Salon, Guajira) are also considered to be forms of "Son".

(The exceptions being Mambo and ChaChaCha, which I had understood to be originally derived from Danzon rather than Son. On the other hand, back in the day, Cuban musicians were also cheerfully combining stylistic elements of Mambo into Son. Cross pollination between genres has always been popular amongst Cuban musicians - generic marketing labels in the USA aren't solely to blame for such blurriness).

Untangling the spaghetti is pretty complicated...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top